Corporate Europe Observatory

Exposing the power of corporate lobbying in the EU

Open letter calling for rules to protect the integrity of climate policy-making from vested corporate interests

Over 75 organisations from across global civil society released a letter this morning calling on the United Nations and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) to implement new rules to safeguard the global climate talks from the undue influence of the fossil fuel industry. 

  • Dansk
  • Nederlands
  • English
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Italiano
  • Bokmål
  • Polski
  • Portuguese
  • Română
  • Slovenščina
  • Español
  • Svenska

Dear UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and UNFCCC Executive Secretary Christiana Figueres,

We are writing to you as a group of civil society organisations, groups and social movements deeply concerned with the fate of the climate. The devastating consequences of super typhoon Yolanda are the latest reminder of the cost of inaction, and the urgency of the task ahead.

Yet the 19th Conference of the Parties (COP19) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), hosted this year by the Polish government in Warsaw, has taken unprecedented and damaging steps towards embracing the same corporations that profit from continued emissions while actively lobbying against effective and just climate action. The Warsaw COP has official corporate “partners” which include the fossil fuel industry and major polluters like PGE, Alstom, LOTOS, ArcelorMittal, BMW, General Motors and Emirates Airlines. Along with a large number of corporate-affiliated side events and the exclusive access to negotiators granted to corporate lobby groups during the business-only pre-COP in October, the hosting Polish government’s Ministry of Economy has teamed up with the World Coal Association – a coal industry lobby group – to put on a parallel "International Coal and Climate Summit", falsely presenting coal as a central part of the solution to climate change and development. Added to this, the UNFCCC secretariat has created the appearance of sanctioning the coal lobby's agenda by allowing executive secretary Christiana Figueres to address the coal summit, despite calls from both the youth constituency and from environmental and development groups not to attend. 

At risk are both our climate and the integrity of the UNFCCC as a multilateral process to tackle climate change. Therefore there is an urgent need for rules to govern the relationship between the UNFCCC and the fossil fuel industry, including obligations for COP Presidents. Rules that would ensure the current damaging situation is avoided, by ending the undue access and influence of polluting businesses and industries, recognising that their direct commercial interests are fundamentally and irreconcilably in conflict with the urgent need for an equitable and ambitious climate policy.

The UN Global Compact’s recently released “Guide for Responsible Corporate Engagement in Climate Policy” (produced in cooperation with the UNFCCC and others), recognises the damaging effect of the fossil fuel industry on climate policy, but its recommended voluntary guidelines for corporate lobbying around climate are woefully inadequate in light of the planetary emergency. To protect the climate and the UNFCCC, an approach corresponding to the scale of the climate crisis is needed.

Other UN bodies have faced similar challenges in addressing the undue influence of harmful industries and dealt with the situation effectively, such as the UN World Health Organisation (WHO). Article 5.3 of its global tobacco treaty, the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), enshrines in international law the principle that the tobacco industry has no role in public health policy-making, due to the “fundamental and irreconcilable conflict between the tobacco industry's interests and public health policy interests” and states that "Parties shall act to protect these policies from commercial and other vested interests of the tobacco industry".

We urge you to look at such examples and take commensurate action to protect climate policy-making from the vested interests of the fossil fuel industry – or companies whose core business model depends on the excessive emission of greenhouse gases – and their attempts to undermine and subvert urgently needed action.


Yours sincerely,

The undersigned organisations

 

350.org

350.org Durban

Aitec-Ipam

Alianza para la Conservacion y Desarrollo

Amigos de la Tierra España, Friends of the Earth Spain

Arab Youth Climate Movement (AYCM)

Asociación Ambientalista de Chiriqui

Attac France

Beyond Copenhagen Collective, India

Bharat Jan Vigyan Jatha (India People's Science Campaign), India

Biofuelwatch UK/US

BlueLink.net, Bulgaria

BUND (Friends of the Earth Germany)

Carbon Trade Watch

Center for Environment, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Clean Beach and Development, Ghana

Climate Crisis Coalition of the Olympia Fellowship of Reconciliation

Climate Policy Program - Institute for Policy Studies (USA)

Conseil de la Jeunesse (Belgian French-speaking youth council)

Corporate Accountability International

Corporate Europe Observatory

Earth in Brackets

European Coalition for Corporate Justice (ECCJ)

Ecologistas en Acción, Spain

EcoNexus

El Comité de Solidaridad con América Latina

Environmental Rights Action, Friends of the Earth Nigeria

FERN

Food & Water Europe

Food & Water Watch

Food Recovery Network

Foundation for Environment and Agriculture, Bulgaria

Friends of the Earth Canada

Friends of the Earth International (FoEI)

Friends of the Earth Scotland

Friends of the Earth United States

Friends of the Siberian Forests (FSF)

Gaia Foundation

Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives (GAIA)

Global Witness

Green America

groundWork, Friends of the Earth South Africa

Gujarat Forum On CDM, India

Health of Mother Earth Foundation

HELIO International

International Institute of Climate Action and Theory (iicat) Climate Justice Project

Justiça Ambiental (Friends of the Earth Mozambique)

La Plataforma Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, Democracia y Desarrollo (PIDHDD)

National Ecological Center of Ukraine

NATIONAL TOXICS NETWORK INC., Australia

Nature Code, Austria

NOAH Friends of the Earth Denmark

Olympia Movement for Justice and Peace (OMJP)

Ong AFRICANDO, Canary Islands (Spain)

ParyavaranMitra, India

People & Planet, UK

Philippine Movement for Climate Justice (PMCJ)

Philippine Rural Reconstruction Movement (PRRM)

Pick Up America/The Harvest Collective, USA

Red de Accion por los Derechos Ambientales, Chile

Regional Advocacy Center "Life", Ukraine

Regional Centre for Development Cooperation(RCDC), India

SEE Change Net

Soldepaz Pachakuti

South Asian Dialogues on Ecological Democracy

South Durban Community Environmental Alliance (SDCEA)

Spinwatch

SWARNA HANSA Foundation

Taiwan Environmental Protection Union

The Corner House, UK

United Kingdom Youth Climate Coalition (UKYCC)

UNIÓN UNIVERSAL DESARROLLO SOLIDARIO

Vision for Alternative Development (VALD), Ghana

Women for Peace and Ecology

World Development Movement (WDM), UK

World Rainforest Movement (WRM)

Young Friends of the Earth EWNI

Za Zemiata - Friends of the Earth Bulgaria

 

[photo courtesy of Langelle/GJEP-GFC]

Primary issue: 
Dear UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and UNFCCC Executive Secretary Christiana Figueres,We are writing to you as a group of civil society organisations, groups and social movements deeply concerned with the fate of the climate. The devastating consequences of super typhoon Yolanda are the latest reminder of the cost of inaction, and the urgency of the task ahead.Yet the 19th Conference of the Parties (COP19) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), hosted this year by the Polish government in Warsaw, has taken unprecedented and damaging steps towards embracing the same corporations that profit from continued emissions while actively lobbying against effective and just climate action. The Warsaw COP has official corporate “partners” which include the fossil fuel industry and major polluters like PGE, Alstom, LOTOS, ArcelorMittal, BMW, General Motors and Emirates Airlines. Along with a large number of corporate-affiliated side events and the exclusive access to negotiators granted to corporate lobby groups during the business-only pre-COP in October, the hosting Polish government’s Ministry of Economy has teamed up with the World Coal Association – a coal industry lobby group – to put on a parallel "International Coal and Climate Summit", falsely presenting coal as a central part of the solution to climate change and development. Added to this, the UNFCCC secretariat has created the appearance of sanctioning the coal lobby's agenda by allowing executive secretary Christiana Figueres to address the coal summit, despite calls from both the youth constituency and from environmental and development groups not to attend. At risk are both our climate and the integrity of the UNFCCC as a multilateral process to tackle climate change. Therefore there is an urgent need for rules to govern the relationship between the UNFCCC and the fossil fuel industry, including obligations for COP Presidents. Rules that would ensure the current damaging situation is avoided, by ending the undue access and influence of polluting businesses and industries, recognising that their direct commercial interests are fundamentally and irreconcilably in conflict with the urgent need for an equitable and ambitious climate policy.The UN Global Compact’s recently released “Guide for Responsible Corporate Engagement in Climate Policy” (produced in cooperation with the UNFCCC and others), recognises the damaging effect of the fossil fuel industry on climate policy, but its recommended voluntary guidelines for corporate lobbying around climate are woefully inadequate in light of the planetary emergency. To protect the climate and the UNFCCC, an approach corresponding to the scale of the climate crisis is needed.Other UN bodies have faced similar challenges in addressing the undue influence of harmful industries and dealt with the situation effectively, such as the UN World Health Organisation (WHO). Article 5.3 of its global tobacco treaty, the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), enshrines in international law the principle that the tobacco industry has no role in public health policy-making, due to the “fundamental and irreconcilable conflict between the tobacco industry's interests and public health policy interests” and states that "Parties shall act to protect these policies from commercial and other vested interests of the tobacco industry".We urge you to look at such examples and take commensurate action to protect climate policy-making from the vested interests of the fossil fuel industry – or companies whose core business model depends on the excessive emission of greenhouse gases – and their attempts to undermine and subvert urgently needed action.Yours sincerely,The undersigned organisations 350.org350.org Durban Aitec-Ipam Alianza para la Conservacion y DesarrolloAmigos de la Tierra España, Friends of the Earth Spain Arab Youth Climate Movement (AYCM) Asociación Ambientalista de Chiriqui Attac FranceBeyond Copenhagen Collective, IndiaBharat Jan Vigyan Jatha (India People's Science Campaign), IndiaBiofuelwatch UK/US BlueLink.net, BulgariaBUND (Friends of the Earth Germany) Carbon Trade Watch Center for Environment, Bosnia and Herzegovina Clean Beach and Development, Ghana Climate Crisis Coalition of the Olympia Fellowship of ReconciliationClimate Policy Program - Institute for Policy Studies (USA) Conseil de la Jeunesse (Belgian French-speaking youth council)Corporate Accountability InternationalCorporate Europe Observatory Earth in Brackets European Coalition for Corporate Justice (ECCJ) Ecologistas en Acción, SpainEcoNexus El Comité de Solidaridad con América Latina Environmental Rights Action, Friends of the Earth Nigeria FERNFood & Water Europe Food & Water Watch Food Recovery Network Foundation for Environment and Agriculture, BulgariaFriends of the Earth Canada Friends of the Earth International (FoEI) Friends of the Earth Scotland Friends of the Earth United StatesFriends of the Siberian Forests (FSF) Gaia FoundationGlobal Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives (GAIA)Global Witness Green America groundWork, Friends of the Earth South Africa Gujarat Forum On CDM, IndiaHealth of Mother Earth FoundationHELIO InternationalInternational Institute of Climate Action and Theory (iicat) Climate Justice Project Justiça Ambiental (Friends of the Earth Mozambique)La Plataforma Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, Democracia y Desarrollo (PIDHDD) National Ecological Center of Ukraine NATIONAL TOXICS NETWORK INC., AustraliaNature Code, AustriaNOAH Friends of the Earth DenmarkOlympia Movement for Justice and Peace (OMJP)Ong AFRICANDO, Canary Islands (Spain) ParyavaranMitra, India People & Planet, UKPhilippine Movement for Climate Justice (PMCJ)Philippine Rural Reconstruction Movement (PRRM)Pick Up America/The Harvest Collective, USA Red de Accion por los Derechos Ambientales, Chile Regional Advocacy Center "Life", UkraineRegional Centre for Development Cooperation(RCDC), IndiaSEE Change NetSoldepaz PachakutiSouth Asian Dialogues on Ecological DemocracySouth Durban Community Environmental Alliance (SDCEA) Spinwatch SWARNA HANSA Foundation Taiwan Environmental Protection Union The Corner House, UK United Kingdom Youth Climate Coalition (UKYCC)UNIÓN UNIVERSAL DESARROLLO SOLIDARIO Vision for Alternative Development (VALD), GhanaWomen for Peace and EcologyWorld Development Movement (WDM), UKWorld Rainforest Movement (WRM)Young Friends of the Earth EWNIZa Zemiata - Friends of the Earth Bulgaria [photo courtesy of Langelle/GJEP-GFC]
 

Comments

Submitted by John Willson (not verified) on

We urgently need strong global action on climate change, and we know that polluting corporations will fight that every step of the way. Let's take steps to limit their influence.

Submitted by Tim Ellis (not verified) on

.... else you could have kept it open for other organisations to sign up. And I bet there still will be many out there who'd like to.

Would it be technically possible to do just that, create some form of list so that companies can indeed add themselves onto it ? Perhaps you'd like a vetting process to ensure that they are serious entries, but still, wouldn't that add more impact.

Anyway, well done on an important initiative. I'd like to help where possible.

As many civil society groups walk back in to the UN climate talks today in Bonn after walking out last November in Warsaw [X], authors of the COP19 Guide to Corporate Lobbying [X], Corporate Europe Observatory, warn that unless we end the cosy relationship between political leaders and the dirty

Concerted lobbying from Europe’s dirtiest industries has resulted in the gutting of EU climate and energy proposals, it has emerged today.

They meet at birthday parties, over breakfast meetings, during cocktail receptions; so just how close are Europe’s dirtiest industries to senior politicians and regulators? And what influence is this lobbying having on the EU’s official climate change policy? These are the kind of questions we need to be asking as leaders from the 28 EU member states try to reach agreement on Europe’s climate targets for 2030. This scrutiny is particularly urgent because – as this privileged access might imply – these industries appear to have been extremely successful at watering down EU climate and energy legislation. Read the new briefing by CEO and Friends of the Earth Europe.
A trade deal between the EU and the US risks opening the backdoor for the expansion of fracking in Europe and the US, reveals a new report by Corporate Europe Observatory together with other groups. As part of the deal currently being negotiated, energy companies could be allowed to take governments to private arbitrators if they attempt to regulate or ban fracking and the dangerous exploitation of unconventional fossil fuels. Campaigners are urging the EU not to include such rights in trade deals.
Campaign groups today called on members of the European Parliament to back citizens' demands for improved rules to prohibit the cultivation of genetically modified (GM) crops. A letter signed by five environment, consumers and farmers groups was sent to all members of the parliament's environment committee, which will debate this controversial issue later in the week.
The new European Parliament is only weeks old and already three ex-MEPs from perhaps its most important committee have taken a spin in the revolving door to join the private sector. It's clear that the code of conduct for MEPs needs urgent reform.
CEO submission to the European Ombudsman Consultation on the composition of Commission expert groups
Scientific advice should be transparent, objective and independent, and there should be more science and more diverse expertise available to the European Commission’s President, a coalition of 28 international and national NGOs wrote in a letter addressed to President-elect Jean-Claude Juncker today (1).

Corporate Europe Forum