Corporate Europe Observatory

Exposing the power of corporate lobbying in the EU

  • Dansk
  • NL
  • EN
  • FI
  • FR
  • DE
  • EL
  • IT
  • NO
  • PL
  • PT
  • RO
  • SL
  • ES
  • SV

Mad Men of the Roundtable

Merkel and Hollande have given key positioning to the European Roundtable of Industrialists and their corporate wish-list. They are set to influence a future Competitiveness Pact – a next step towards authoritarian neoliberalism.

Merkel and Hollande are rebuilding the Franco-German engine for the next steps of EU integration. The two core governments are going for a leading role in the creation of new rules on common economic policies, in particular the upcoming Competitiveness Pact. As if to make sure that what they come up with fits neatly with the interests of big business, they’ve invited the European Roundtable of Industrialists (ERT), one of the most powerful lobby groups in Europe, to help them out. In response, the ERT seems to be laying on the table an entire corporate wish-list. If big business gets its way, will 'competitiveness' be the only thing that counts?

First, German Chancellor Angela Merkel invited French President Hollande and Commissioner Barroso to Berlin in March for an encounter with no less than 15 members of the ERT, all of them CEOs from big corporations1. The two governments then selected two ERT veterans, Gerhard Cromme (Siemens) and Jean-Louis Beffa (Suèz), to be chairs of a Franco-German “Working group on Competitiveness”2. While Beffa left the club recently, the choices remain worrying. That's because the demands of the ERT appear to amount to nothing less than putting the European Union entirely at the service of corporations.

Mad men of the roundtable

This is clear from the breathtaking ambition of the ERT's plans, laid out in recent statements, which don't just address a few upcoming proposals, but the entire body of legislation – past and present – that affects business. Their wish-list is all encompassing3:

  • For existing legislation: identification of legislation “which inhibit growth and could be discontinued without affecting fundamental protections.”

  • For legislation going through the decision-making process: an immediate “moratorium on all business-related regulation, including the implementation of existing regulations at the EU and national levels, which has no proven immediate positive effect on economic growth.”

  • For future legislation: the creation of an independent mechanism or body (i.e. no public servants, but presumably with people close to the business community) “to guarantee that all business-related policy proposals are assessed for their expected effect on economic growth and, crucially, also for their initial cost for business.”4. To make sure this body doesn’t just opt for the first version of the proposal, the ERT wants screening to continue all the way through the process, and it even wants amendments to have to be screened.

Franco-German business demands

The report from the EU's Franco-German Working Group is – not surprisingly given its ERT veteran chairs – rather similar5. It says straight out that the European Union should “refrain from introducing new legislative proposals that are detrimental to investments”, as if no other interests are valid. It then goes into the specifics of what reads like a corporate wish-list. In short, the business group wants to see cheaper energy, including by bringing fracking to Europe, reduction of taxation, unrestricted access to raw materials globally, a roll back of the (already very limited) achievements in banking regulation, a further weakening of labour laws across Europe, and a massive strengthening of private alternatives to public services (i.e. privatisation). As working group Chair Gerhard Cromme once famously stated: “Far preferable would be the privatisation of all schools, subjecting them to market forces and thereby encouraging competition: Schools will respond better to paying customers, just like any other business..."6.

In addition to this, there are a few proposals included to remind us that it’s not just any old business community whose interests are to be protected but the largest and most powerful: the recommendations include an attack on attempts by the Commission to stop mergers and acquisitions to prevent monopolies. Clearly in there interest of the very corporations represented in the ERT.

What is their key argument? It’s the big EU buzz word “competitiveness”, of course.

Towards a Competitiveness Pact

The Working Group's report comes at a time when Angela Merkel and Hollande are gearing up to get the other member states to sign up to a “Competitiveness Pact”. That project has been in the pipeline for several months, and for a while interest seemed to be fading. But with the Franco-German initiative, a specific procedure is on the table that foresees a final proposal to be agreed either in December this year or in early 2014 at the EU Spring Summit. At the heart of the pact will be “contractual arrangements” that are to bind member states economic policies to “structural reforms”, such as weakening of labour laws, low wages, business friendly regulation, and much more.

In this field, the preferred approach of the Working Group is simply to have member states commit – by contract – to implement the recommendations that the Commission issues annually on budgets and economic policies. Considering the nature of these recommendations, this is scary.

Stop the mad men

With the European Union continuing along the path of a kind of authoritarian neoliberalism, there is every reason to keep a close eye on the next steps. And the next step is likely to be a Competitiveness Pact, now seriously being fleshed out with big business as the key advisors.

Some might think of the European Roundtable of Industrialists (ERT) as a relic of the past. Two or three decades ago, the club of CEOs of big European corporations would be in on even the biggest decisions on the development of the EU treaty. But with today’s swarming and mushrooming corporate lobbying in and around the EU institutions in Brussels, you might think, the supreme lobby group had taken the back bench.

The Franco-German initiative shows that this is certainly not so. The ERT was always a group that kept its distance from petty squabbles over single pieces of legislation, but instead moves resolutely when the big issues are at stake. This is a case in point. The ERT has outrageous plans that with breathtaking ease they are invited to bring to the table where our future is being mapped. Does this mean that Merkel and Hollande will simply cut and paste their advice into proposals for upcoming discussions at EU summits? Probably not, but letting this group set the agenda to this extent is already a worrying sign, and one that should provoke social movements all over Europe to get ready for a decisive struggle.

The Competitiveness Pact will be debated at a public meeting in Brussels on Wednesday the 26th of June. Read more here.

Merkel and Hollande are rebuilding the Franco-German engine for the next steps of EU integration. The two core governments are going for a leading role in the creation of new rules on common economic policies, in particular the upcoming Competitiveness Pact. As if to make sure that what they come up with fits neatly with the interests of big business, they’ve invited the European Roundtable of Industrialists (ERT), one of the most powerful lobby groups in Europe, to help them out. In response, the ERT seems to be laying on the table an entire corporate wish-list. If big business gets its way, will 'competitiveness' be the only thing that counts?First, German Chancellor Angela Merkel invited French President Hollande and Commissioner Barroso to Berlin in March for an encounter with no less than 15 members of the ERT, all of them CEOs from big corporations1. The two governments then selected two ERT veterans, Gerhard Cromme (Siemens) and Jean-Louis Beffa (Suèz), to be chairs of a Franco-German “Working group on Competitiveness”2. While Beffa left the club recently, the choices remain worrying. That's because the demands of the ERT appear to amount to nothing less than putting the European Union entirely at the service of corporations.Mad men of the roundtableThis is clear from the breathtaking ambition of the ERT's plans, laid out in recent statements, which don't just address a few upcoming proposals, but the entire body of legislation – past and present – that affects business. Their wish-list is all encompassing3:For existing legislation: identification of legislation “which inhibit growth and could be discontinued without affecting fundamental protections.”For legislation going through the decision-making process: an immediate “moratorium on all business-related regulation, including the implementation of existing regulations at the EU and national levels, which has no proven immediate positive effect on economic growth.”For future legislation: the creation of an independent mechanism or body (i.e. no public servants, but presumably with people close to the business community) “to guarantee that all business-related policy proposals are assessed for their expected effect on economic growth and, crucially, also for their initial cost for business.”4. To make sure this body doesn’t just opt for the first version of the proposal, the ERT wants screening to continue all the way through the process, and it even wants amendments to have to be screened.Franco-German business demandsThe report from the EU's Franco-German Working Group is – not surprisingly given its ERT veteran chairs – rather similar5. It says straight out that the European Union should “refrain from introducing new legislative proposals that are detrimental to investments”, as if no other interests are valid. It then goes into the specifics of what reads like a corporate wish-list. In short, the business group wants to see cheaper energy, including by bringing fracking to Europe, reduction of taxation, unrestricted access to raw materials globally, a roll back of the (already very limited) achievements in banking regulation, a further weakening of labour laws across Europe, and a massive strengthening of private alternatives to public services (i.e. privatisation). As working group Chair Gerhard Cromme once famously stated: “Far preferable would be the privatisation of all schools, subjecting them to market forces and thereby encouraging competition: Schools will respond better to paying customers, just like any other business..."6.In addition to this, there are a few proposals included to remind us that it’s not just any old business community whose interests are to be protected but the largest and most powerful: the recommendations include an attack on attempts by the Commission to stop mergers and acquisitions to prevent monopolies. Clearly in there interest of the very corporations represented in the ERT.What is their key argument? It’s the big EU buzz word “competitiveness”, of course.Towards a Competitiveness PactThe Working Group's report comes at a time when Angela Merkel and Hollande are gearing up to get the other member states to sign up to a “Competitiveness Pact”. That project has been in the pipeline for several months, and for a while interest seemed to be fading. But with the Franco-German initiative, a specific procedure is on the table that foresees a final proposal to be agreed either in December this year or in early 2014 at the EU Spring Summit. At the heart of the pact will be “contractual arrangements” that are to bind member states economic policies to “structural reforms”, such as weakening of labour laws, low wages, business friendly regulation, and much more.In this field, the preferred approach of the Working Group is simply to have member states commit – by contract – to implement the recommendations that the Commission issues annually on budgets and economic policies. Considering the nature of these recommendations, this is scary.Stop the mad menWith the European Union continuing along the path of a kind of authoritarian neoliberalism, there is every reason to keep a close eye on the next steps. And the next step is likely to be a Competitiveness Pact, now seriously being fleshed out with big business as the key advisors.Some might think of the European Roundtable of Industrialists (ERT) as a relic of the past. Two or three decades ago, the club of CEOs of big European corporations would be in on even the biggest decisions on the development of the EU treaty. But with today’s swarming and mushrooming corporate lobbying in and around the EU institutions in Brussels, you might think, the supreme lobby group had taken the back bench.The Franco-German initiative shows that this is certainly not so. The ERT was always a group that kept its distance from petty squabbles over single pieces of legislation, but instead moves resolutely when the big issues are at stake. This is a case in point. The ERT has outrageous plans that with breathtaking ease they are invited to bring to the table where our future is being mapped. Does this mean that Merkel and Hollande will simply cut and paste their advice into proposals for upcoming discussions at EU summits? Probably not, but letting this group set the agenda to this extent is already a worrying sign, and one that should provoke social movements all over Europe to get ready for a decisive struggle.The Competitiveness Pact will be debated at a public meeting in Brussels on Wednesday the 26th of June. Read more here. 1. See Corporate Europe Observatory; “Merkel and the dreams of corporate leaders”, May 2013, http://corporateeurope.org/blog/merkel-and-dreams-corporate-leaders 2. See the press release of the French and German governments from 30. May 2013, page 4: http://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/_Anlagen/2013/05/2013-05-30-dt-... 3. On the demands of the ERT, see Corporate Europe Observatory; “The Roundtable goes for full conquest”, July 2012, http://corporateeurope.org/news/roundtable-goes-full-conquest 4. All ERT quotes from the ERT statement “Creating growth in Europe”, January 2012, http://www.ert.eu/sites/default/files/2012%20January%20-%20ERT%20Stateme... 5. Franco-German Working Group; “Competitiveness an Growth”, http://www.rapportbeffacromme.eu/beffa-cromme_en_corr.pdf 6. Gerhard Cromme made the comment at the European Business Summit workshop entitled: "Nurturing Innovators Through Education" Friday 9 June 2000.
 

Comments

Submitted by Leo (not verified) on

The destruction of school as we know it (I am 70 years old) is almost complete in most of the western world -- Europe being no exception.

It is proved that introducing computers and screens at an early stage destroys the education, the formation of the intellect and criticism. Consumerism and predatory hypercapitalism work hand in hand and have taken over and lead us to the destruction of the society.

Only a huge surge in solidarity and consciousness of common decency, of common sacred values, can defer, if not defeat them.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

This summer Greece's financial authorities fined 20 hedge funds for speculating against the Greek economy. Now, the main global lobby group for hedge funds is trying to tweak the EU's rules so they can have a free play in the future.

Civil society groups denounce the Commission's plan for a Capital Markets Union. No lesson has been learnt from the financial crisis, they say.
Story

Not our Europe

The ‘agreement’ that the eurozone countries and the Troika forced on the Greek government during the “night of shame” strangled space for a progressive project. It is not only dangerous for the Greeks, but for citizens all across the European Union.
A crusade for big business-friendly deregulation, waged during José Manuel Barroso's Presidency of the European Commission, shows no signs of stopping. This neoliberal push to weaken or block new legislation appears likely to expand with Jean-Claude Juncker's new Commission team.

The official EU assessment of glyphosate was based on unpublished studies owned by industry. Seven months later, the pesticide industry still fights disclosure and, so far, successfully. We obtained a copy of their arguments.

While CEO is not taking a position on the UK referendum, many of our publications are relevant to those who will have a vote, or those who are following the debate.

Biodiversity collapse, the future of agriculture, politics versus science, EU States and the European Commission shifting blame on each other, industry's capture of the regulatory process through data secrecy, a Commissioner caught between Juncker, EU States, lobby groups, and his own services... The glyphosate saga, coming to the end of its first phase tomorrow, has been an entry point into many broader problems. Overview.

The European Commission proposal on scientific criteria defining endocrine disruptors (EDCs) is the latest dangerous outgrowth of a highly toxic debate. The chemical lobby, supported by certain Commission factions (notably DG SANTE and the Secretary-General) and some member states (UK and Germany), has put significant obstacles in the way of effective public health and environment regulation.

 
 
 
 
 
-- placeholder --
 
 
 

The corporate lobby tour