Corporate Europe Observatory

Exposing the power of corporate lobbying in the EU

  • Dansk
  • NL
  • EN
  • FI
  • FR
  • DE
  • EL
  • IT
  • NO
  • PL
  • PT
  • RO
  • SL
  • ES
  • SV

TTIP: "Regulatory Cooperation" a threat to democracy

Statement from 45 organisations on the new EU proposal on Regulatory Cooperation

Dear Commissioner Malmström,

The undersigned organisations are writing to express our deep concern with
the new EU proposal on horizontal regulatory cooperation (dated 21. March
2016) in the EU-US TTIP negotiations . We consider it a threat to democratic
decision-making and regulation in the public interest.

The new EU position paper on “regulatory cooperation and good regulatory
practices" offers an insight into how negotiators hope to avoid future "nontariff"
and "technical barriers" to trade. While it is unclear precisely what form
such “cooperation” would take, we understand that the proposals would entail
several changes to EU and US law-making processes.

Here is our critical assessment of the new EU proposal:

1. The proposal makes it possible for the US to exert undue influence at a very
early stage of decision-making, before any proposal is considered by elected
bodies, namely the Council and the European Parliament. Judging from past
experience, such an approach can have a detrimental impact on regulation in
the public interest. It also undermines democracy.

2. The proposal provides big business groups with the tools to influence
legislation that they have been demanding, including a mechanism by which
transatlantic business coalitions can include their own preferences in the
regulatory cooperation working programme. The establishment of a broad
advisory group with the presence of public interest groups does not offset this
institutionalisation of lobbying.

3. The new proposal clearly identifies the European Commission and US
regulatory agencies as drivers and responsible actors for transatlantic
regulatory cooperation. The question of how it is supposed to function is
postponed until after the ratification of TTIP and thus to a moment when it gets
less public attention is on it. So we see no major improvement here. It implies
an unacceptable power grab by the Commission, strengthens the US impact on
EU regulation and weakens the role of the European Parliament. Even though
the proposal does not contain a Regulatory Cooperation Body (RCB) any
longer, its functions still remain.

4. The proposal gives immense powers to "regulatory authorities" (the
European Commission in the case of the EU) to decide on the development of
regulatory cooperation, including on the selection of areas which the two sides
are to cooperate on.

5. The new proposals imply an importation of elements of the US regulatory
system to the EU, among them an enhanced role for impact assessment by
means of cost-benefit analyses in the planning phase of legislation. The
balance between trade criteria and environmental and social issues is not met.
This could lead to the watering down and delay of important legislation in the
public interest.

Given the five points mentioned above, we ask you to end the TTIP
negotiations, as trade agreements are not the appropriate fora to decide on
our public interest laws.

Signed,

Amis de la Terre France
Asociaţia România Vie/Romania Alive Society
Attac Austria
Attac Bizkaia
Attac Denmark
Attac Germany
Attac Spain
Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland (BUND)
Campact
Campagna Stop TTIP Italia
Coordinadora de Organizaciones de Agricultores y Ganaderos (COAG)
Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO)
Ecologistas en Acción
Electronic Frontier Finland
European Digital Rights (EDRi)
Fairwatch (Italy)
Finnish TTIP Network
FÍS NUA
Forum für Umwelt- und Entwicklung
Global Justice Now
Greenpeace
Keep Ireland Fracking Free
Koalicija Proti Tajnim Sporazumom
LobbyControl
Mehr Demokratie e.V.
Oplysningsforbundet May Day
Plataforma Não ao Tratado Transatlântico
Portuguese Platform No to the Transatlantic Treaty
PowerShift e.V.
Protestival Slovenia
Red Solidaria contra la Ocupación de Palestina (RESCOP)
Seattle to Brussels Network (S2B)
Skiftet
Slovenski E-forum
Society Movement for Sustainable Development of Slovenia – TRS
Solidarna Bulgaria
Stop TTIP UK
SumOfUs
Bündnis TTIP Unfairhandelbar
Transnational Institute (TNI)
War on Want
Women in Europe for a Common Future (WECF)
Wittener Bündnis gegen TTIP/CETA/TISA
Xnet
4th Group of the United Left

Dear Commissioner Malmström,The undersigned organisations are writing to express our deep concern withthe new EU proposal on horizontal regulatory cooperation (dated 21. March2016) in the EU-US TTIP negotiations . We consider it a threat to democraticdecision-making and regulation in the public interest.The new EU position paper on “regulatory cooperation and good regulatorypractices" offers an insight into how negotiators hope to avoid future "nontariff"and "technical barriers" to trade. While it is unclear precisely what formsuch “cooperation” would take, we understand that the proposals would entailseveral changes to EU and US law-making processes.Here is our critical assessment of the new EU proposal:1. The proposal makes it possible for the US to exert undue influence at a veryearly stage of decision-making, before any proposal is considered by electedbodies, namely the Council and the European Parliament. Judging from pastexperience, such an approach can have a detrimental impact on regulation inthe public interest. It also undermines democracy.2. The proposal provides big business groups with the tools to influencelegislation that they have been demanding, including a mechanism by whichtransatlantic business coalitions can include their own preferences in theregulatory cooperation working programme. The establishment of a broadadvisory group with the presence of public interest groups does not offset thisinstitutionalisation of lobbying.3. The new proposal clearly identifies the European Commission and USregulatory agencies as drivers and responsible actors for transatlanticregulatory cooperation. The question of how it is supposed to function ispostponed until after the ratification of TTIP and thus to a moment when it getsless public attention is on it. So we see no major improvement here. It impliesan unacceptable power grab by the Commission, strengthens the US impact onEU regulation and weakens the role of the European Parliament. Even thoughthe proposal does not contain a Regulatory Cooperation Body (RCB) anylonger, its functions still remain.4. The proposal gives immense powers to "regulatory authorities" (theEuropean Commission in the case of the EU) to decide on the development ofregulatory cooperation, including on the selection of areas which the two sidesare to cooperate on.5. The new proposals imply an importation of elements of the US regulatorysystem to the EU, among them an enhanced role for impact assessment bymeans of cost-benefit analyses in the planning phase of legislation. Thebalance between trade criteria and environmental and social issues is not met.This could lead to the watering down and delay of important legislation in thepublic interest.Given the five points mentioned above, we ask you to end the TTIPnegotiations, as trade agreements are not the appropriate fora to decide onour public interest laws.Signed,Amis de la Terre FranceAsociaţia România Vie/Romania Alive SocietyAttac AustriaAttac BizkaiaAttac DenmarkAttac GermanyAttac SpainBund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland (BUND)CampactCampagna Stop TTIP ItaliaCoordinadora de Organizaciones de Agricultores y Ganaderos (COAG)Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO)Ecologistas en AcciónElectronic Frontier FinlandEuropean Digital Rights (EDRi)Fairwatch (Italy)Finnish TTIP NetworkFÍS NUAForum für Umwelt- und EntwicklungGlobal Justice NowGreenpeaceKeep Ireland Fracking FreeKoalicija Proti Tajnim SporazumomLobbyControlMehr Demokratie e.V.Oplysningsforbundet May DayPlataforma Não ao Tratado TransatlânticoPortuguese Platform No to the Transatlantic TreatyPowerShift e.V.Protestival SloveniaRed Solidaria contra la Ocupación de Palestina (RESCOP)Seattle to Brussels Network (S2B)SkiftetSlovenski E-forumSociety Movement for Sustainable Development of Slovenia – TRSSolidarna BulgariaStop TTIP UKSumOfUsBündnis TTIP UnfairhandelbarTransnational Institute (TNI)War on WantWomen in Europe for a Common Future (WECF)Wittener Bündnis gegen TTIP/CETA/TISAXnet4th Group of the United Left
 

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

A deregulation agenda is sweeping through the Commission & member states, particularly pushed by the UK.

The recent leak of many parts of TTIP, allowing us for the first time to read the negotiating position of the US, confirms our most serious concerns.

Dangerous attacks against regulations protecting public interest wouldn't be prevented by 'new' proposals.

Despite growing concerns among the European public, the new EU proposal on regulatory cooperation in TTIP does nothing to address the upcoming democratic threats.

Biodiversity collapse, the future of agriculture, politics versus science, EU States and the European Commission shifting blame on each other, industry's capture of the regulatory process through data secrecy, a Commissioner caught between Juncker, EU States, lobby groups, and his own services... The glyphosate saga, coming to an end this week with the European Commission's decision to extend its licence, has been an entry point into many broader problems. Overview.

The official EU assessment of glyphosate was based on unpublished studies owned by industry. Seven months later, the pesticide industry still fights disclosure and, so far, successfully. We obtained a copy of their arguments.

While CEO is not taking a position on the UK referendum, many of our publications are relevant to those who will have a vote, or those who are following the debate.

The current struggle in France over labour law reforms is not just between the Government and trade unions – a European battle is waged. The attacks on social rights stem in no small part from the web of EU-rules dubbed 'economic governance', invented to impose austerity policies on member states.

 
 
 
 
 
-- placeholder --
 
 
 

The corporate lobby tour