Corporate Europe Observatory

Exposing the power of corporate lobbying in the EU

“The EU crisis is a governance issue”

  • Dansk
  • Nederlands
  • English
  • Français
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Italiano
  • Portuguese
  • Español
  • Svenska
May 14th 2012
Printer-friendly versionSend by emailPDF version

Following CEO's EU in crisis conference, we are sharing contributions from conference participants giving their impressions from the conference. This contribution was written by Virginia Lopez.

Those who stayed for the closing plenary heard calls for citizens' mobilization. In the face of frontal attacks to their rights citizens must reclaim democracy and policies that put people at the centre. Indeed, the roots of today's crisis go beyond economic policy: it is a governance issue.

In our discussions on 5th and 6th May some of us called for growth and full employment, and for an end to austerity. We were outraged that workers' rights are under attack, emphasized the important role trade unions have to play in the resistance, stated that organized action at the workplace cannot be replaced by any other type of action. I do agree with all those points but I admit I am wary of letting our strategies focus on 'workers' rights', investment and growth, for two reasons.

One is that there are collectives, in addition to workers, that bear much of the damage from austerity measures. Migrants' rights are axed overnight; Spain for example has limited their access to healthcare while many Greeks voted for a neo-Nazi party on 6th May. Women are affected not only as workers but in their (gender) role as carers - bearing the brunt of dismantled social security systems. Sonia Mitralia argues that 'Greek women are now obliged to substitute for practically all public services (…) And all that is absolutely free'. In the UK, the Fawcett Society calls it the 'triple jeopardy' for women. Other collectives, particularly those working in the informal economy and those whose work is not recognized as work, like that of women responsible for reproductive tasks, would also feel their struggles are not factored in if we concentrate on for worker's rights as a strategy of resistance.

A second reason is that calling for growth and investment doesn't seem to question productivist discourses, capitalist and neoliberal being just two types of productivist discourse.

In fact, I felt that there was consensus among participants that the EU crisis is a governance issue: the democratic deficit of the European Union architecture, the hierarchies between member States and the lack of equality are at the core of the crisis. Yet, I left with the impression that are we lagging behind in devising concrete strategies and actions to pursue long-term goals like overcoming productivism, reinventing European democracy and bringing about equality.

It is in forums like the conference last weekend that we can come together and debate face to face this and other aspects of our alternative roadmap. Personally, I was able to 'map out' the different struggles taking place in Europe and understand better the different angles taken by different groups in responding to the crisis. That's indeed a step forward if what we want is to develop a common response! I am really looking forward to the next forum, I might get answers to the questions that arose from this meeting then.

Virginia Lopez

Virginia Lopez is an activist with Occupy London.

Those who stayed for the closing plenary heard calls for citizens' mobilization. In the face of frontal attacks to their rights citizens must reclaim democracy and policies that put people at the centre. Indeed, the roots of today's crisis go beyond economic policy: it is a governance issue.In our discussions on 5th and 6th May some of us called for growth and full employment, and for an end to austerity. We were outraged that workers' rights are under attack, emphasized the important role trade unions have to play in the resistance, stated that organized action at the workplace cannot be replaced by any other type of action. I do agree with all those points but I admit I am wary of letting our strategies focus on 'workers' rights', investment and growth, for two reasons.One is that there are collectives, in addition to workers, that bear much of the damage from austerity measures. Migrants' rights are axed overnight; Spain for example has limited their access to healthcare while many Greeks voted for a neo-Nazi party on 6th May. Women are affected not only as workers but in their (gender) role as carers - bearing the brunt of dismantled social security systems. Sonia Mitralia argues that 'Greek women are now obliged to substitute for practically all public services (…) And all that is absolutely free'. In the UK, the Fawcett Society calls it the 'triple jeopardy' for women. Other collectives, particularly those working in the informal economy and those whose work is not recognized as work, like that of women responsible for reproductive tasks, would also feel their struggles are not factored in if we concentrate on for worker's rights as a strategy of resistance.A second reason is that calling for growth and investment doesn't seem to question productivist discourses, capitalist and neoliberal being just two types of productivist discourse.In fact, I felt that there was consensus among participants that the EU crisis is a governance issue: the democratic deficit of the European Union architecture, the hierarchies between member States and the lack of equality are at the core of the crisis. Yet, I left with the impression that are we lagging behind in devising concrete strategies and actions to pursue long-term goals like overcoming productivism, reinventing European democracy and bringing about equality.It is in forums like the conference last weekend that we can come together and debate face to face this and other aspects of our alternative roadmap. Personally, I was able to 'map out' the different struggles taking place in Europe and understand better the different angles taken by different groups in responding to the crisis. That's indeed a step forward if what we want is to develop a common response! I am really looking forward to the next forum, I might get answers to the questions that arose from this meeting then.
 
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Similar entries

Stop the EU attack on social rights

New rules that could mean cuts to social expenditure, wages and workers' rights are currently being debated in the EU. If the proposals go ahead, decisions about such cuts could be made without public debate or discussion. Cuts would simply be imposed by EU technocrats. Such a decision undermines the very principles of democracy and threatens workers' rights and the welfare state.



This has to be stopped!

Investment rights stifle democracy

Next week, MEPs are due to vote on a report from the Parliament’s international trade committee (INTA) about Europe’s international investment policy – giving guidelines for the rights of foreign investors under future EU trade deals. The vote follows fierce attempts by law firms, industry and member states to enshrine the right of foreign investors to challenge national laws that affect their profits. As a result, European member states could soon find domestic laws challenged by foreign companies – and politicians will have no powers to intervene.

EU in crisis: analysis, resistance and alternatives to Corporate Europe

The EU’s response to the financial crisis and the escalating eurocrisis has exposed more clearly than ever the disastrous dominance of neoliberal ideology. Obsessed with budgetary discipline, EU decision-makers are imposing sweeping austerity measures, privatising public services and cutting welfare. Corporate lobby groups see their longstanding demands implemented overnight while the living standards of millions are undermined and economies grind to a halt.

Spain in crisis: the role of the EU

A CEO summary of the article Boom and (deep) crisis in the Spanish economy: the role of the EU in its evolution by Miren Etxezarreta, Francisco Navarro, Ramón Ribera and Victòria Soldevila, members of the Seminario de Economía Crítica TAIFA. The original article contains a number of informative tables and graphs.

77 civil society organisations call on MEPs to reject EU economic governance proposals

Today, 28 September 2011, the European Parliament votes on six legislative acts on "economic governance", also known as the "six-pack on economic governance". Corporate Europe Observatory, together with other European public interest organisations and trade unions calls on MEPs to reject the six proposals, and to join forces with social movements in our attempt to set Europe on a new course, a course of democracy, welfare and social rights.

Pages


The Brussels Business: Who runs the EU?

Corporate Europe Observatory

Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) is a research and campaign group working to expose and challenge the privileged access and influence enjoyed by corporations and their lobby groups in EU policy making.

Read more

Creative Commons License
All content on this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Corporate Europe Forum