Corporate Europe Observatory

Exposing the power of corporate lobbying in the EU

Obscured by the smoke

  • Dansk
  • Nederlands
  • English
  • Français
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Italiano
  • Portuguese
  • Español
  • Svenska
Printer-friendly versionSend by emailPDF version
Obscured by the smoke - British American Tobacco's deadly lobbying agenda in the EUBritish American Tobacco (BAT) spent more than €700,000 lobbying the EU last year, up to four times as much as the company declared on the EU's register of interest representatives, new research by Corporate Europe Observatory has revealed. This report argues that BAT's hidden lobbying activities, which are clearly not in the public interest, should be exposed to public scrutiny. British American Tobacco's hidden lobbying expenditure
Lobbying Kills

British American Tobacco (BAT) spent more than €700,000 lobbying the EU last year, up to four times as much as the company declared on the EU’s register of interest representatives, new research by Corporate Europe Observatory has revealed. This report argues that BAT's hidden lobbying activities, which are clearly not in the public interest, should be exposed to public scrutiny.

As the world’s number two tobacco company, European multinational British American Tobacco (BAT) has been lobbying the EU institutions on a number of fronts in recent years. Fighting against the harmonisation of cigarette duty, battling against smoking bans in public places and campaigning to lift the EU ban on a ‘smokeless’ tobacco product called ‘snus’ were all high on the company’s agenda. At the same time, BAT has tried to establish itself as a leader in corporate social responsibility (CSR) to try to appear as a ‘legitimate’ stakeholder to EU lawmakers and to maintain dialogue with them in a general context of suspicion against the tobacco industry.


As this report shows, the most important part of this lobbying job has been done ‘undercover’, using two main channels. Firstly, BAT hides behind a myriad of associations which are used as ‘vehicles’ for EU lobbying. Some are Brussels-based, others are in member states or even in non-EU countries. Due to loopholes in EU lobbying transparency rules and a lack of enforcement, the amount of money paid to such lobbying vehicles is not available publicly. Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has found that as well as the official amount registered on the Commission’s voluntary register of interest representatives (€150,000-200,000), BAT contributed twice as much again to three main lobbying bodies (CECCM, ESTA, ESTOC). Some of the names of BAT-funded lobby groups and front groups active in Brussels are not even disclosed on the register, let alone the amounts paid. CEO has discovered that at least €527,000 was paid to associations lobbying on BAT’s behalf, increasing its lobbying budget fourfold to €677,000-727,000.


Secondly, anticipating new international rules hostile to pro-tobacco advocacy, BAT has innovated in the lobbying field by using ‘corporate social responsibility’ (CSR) as a lobbying tool. In 2006-2007, under the banner of a so-called ‘EU stakeholder dialogue’, the company obtained direct access to at least 42 EU policymakers, targeting them with political messages directly related to pieces of legislation being discussed in Brussels. Arguing that it was ‘CSR’ and not ‘lobbying’, BAT refused to disclose the budget of this two-year campaign involving in-house personnel, two external lobbying firms, one communications agency and one auditing firm. It can however be assumed that this campaign involved considerable expenditure.


CEO estimates that BAT’s real lobbying budget could in fact be at least five times higher than the amount disclosed on the voluntary register. This is a very conservative estimate that does not include the lobbying budgets spent in each member state to influence EU decisions.

Read the full report here:

British American Tobacco (BAT) spent more than €700,000 lobbying the EU last year, up to four times as much as the company declared on the EU’s register of interest representatives, new research by Corporate Europe Observatory has revealed. This report argues that BAT's hidden lobbying activities, which are clearly not in the public interest, should be exposed to public scrutiny. As the world’s number two tobacco company, European multinational British American Tobacco (BAT) has been lobbying the EU institutions on a number of fronts in recent years. Fighting against the harmonisation of cigarette duty, battling against smoking bans in public places and campaigning to lift the EU ban on a ‘smokeless’ tobacco product called ‘snus’ were all high on the company’s agenda. At the same time, BAT has tried to establish itself as a leader in corporate social responsibility (CSR) to try to appear as a ‘legitimate’ stakeholder to EU lawmakers and to maintain dialogue with them in a general context of suspicion against the tobacco industry. As this report shows, the most important part of this lobbying job has been done ‘undercover’, using two main channels. Firstly, BAT hides behind a myriad of associations which are used as ‘vehicles’ for EU lobbying. Some are Brussels-based, others are in member states or even in non-EU countries. Due to loopholes in EU lobbying transparency rules and a lack of enforcement, the amount of money paid to such lobbying vehicles is not available publicly. Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has found that as well as the official amount registered on the Commission’s voluntary register of interest representatives (€150,000-200,000), BAT contributed twice as much again to three main lobbying bodies (CECCM, ESTA, ESTOC). Some of the names of BAT-funded lobby groups and front groups active in Brussels are not even disclosed on the register, let alone the amounts paid. CEO has discovered that at least €527,000 was paid to associations lobbying on BAT’s behalf, increasing its lobbying budget fourfold to €677,000-727,000. Secondly, anticipating new international rules hostile to pro-tobacco advocacy, BAT has innovated in the lobbying field by using ‘corporate social responsibility’ (CSR) as a lobbying tool. In 2006-2007, under the banner of a so-called ‘EU stakeholder dialogue’, the company obtained direct access to at least 42 EU policymakers, targeting them with political messages directly related to pieces of legislation being discussed in Brussels. Arguing that it was ‘CSR’ and not ‘lobbying’, BAT refused to disclose the budget of this two-year campaign involving in-house personnel, two external lobbying firms, one communications agency and one auditing firm. It can however be assumed that this campaign involved considerable expenditure. CEO estimates that BAT’s real lobbying budget could in fact be at least five times higher than the amount disclosed on the voluntary register. This is a very conservative estimate that does not include the lobbying budgets spent in each member state to influence EU decisions. Read the full report here:
 

Similar entries

The Commission’s shabby implementation of UN rules for tobacco lobbying

Almost two months after Commissioner John Dalli resigned, it is still not clear what exactly happened in this tobacco lobby scandal. Commission officials have told Brussels journalists that Dalli had to resign because he held undisclosed meetings with tobacco lobbyists. But if Health Commissioner John Dalli had to resign because of undisclosed meetings with tobacco lobbyists, shouldn’t the same logic apply to high-level Commission officials in Barroso’s cabinet, at the Secretariat-General and other DGs?

Health and transparency NGOs demand Commission implements UN tobacco lobbying rules

Transparency, public health and tobacco control NGOs have today written to EU Commission President Barroso to complain about Commission officials having undisclosed meetings with tobacco lobbyists, in violation of UN rules. The undisclosed meetings are particularly controversial in the context of the Dalligate tobacco lobbying scandal, which led to the resignation of Commissioner Dalli under unclear and contested circumstances.

Business lobbying hollows out new EU proposal for social and environmental company reporting

The European Commission's new proposal for company reporting on non-financial issues has been severely weakened by industry lobbying, a new report by Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) shows. While the Commission originally considered requiring companies to publish data on their social and environmental impact, the proposal presented yesterday takes a voluntary approach with no means of enforcement. The proposal would only apply to a mere 0.3% of all European firms - and even those covered have ample opportunity to escape scrutiny.

Lobbying campaign by hedge funds not declared in Commission register

According to eFinancialCareers "it emerged yesterday that the Alternative Investment Management Association is paying Finsbury €1m to lobby against the EU’s Alternative Investment Fund Managers’ Directive."

Clear the smoke in Brussels - demand lobbying transparency

Corporate Europe Observatory and other members of the ALTER-EU alliance are urging European citizens to demand the full facts about what happened in the lobbying scandal that led to the resignation of Commissioner Dalli. Why was the Commissioner forced to resign and what was the role of the tobacco lobby? The Commission must end its secrecy and release the full facts about Dalligate

Pages


The Brussels Business: Who runs the EU?

Corporate Europe Observatory

Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) is a research and campaign group working to expose and challenge the privileged access and influence enjoyed by corporations and their lobby groups in EU policy making.

Read more

Creative Commons License
All content on this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Corporate Europe Forum