Corporate Europe Observatory

Exposing the power of corporate lobbying in the EU

  • Dansk
  • NL
  • EN
  • FI
  • FR
  • DE
  • EL
  • IT
  • NO
  • PL
  • PT
  • RO
  • SL
  • ES
  • SV

Ombudsman investigates EU Commission's failure to implement UN tobacco lobby rules

The European Ombudsman, Emily O'Reilly, has now confirmed that she will investigate the European Commission's failure to properly implement UN rules for contacts with tobacco lobbyists, following a complaint submitted by Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO).

José Manuel Barroso
José Manuel Barroso
European Parliament via Flickr (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

The EU is a signatory to the World Health Organisation's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, which obliges governments to limit interactions with the tobacco industry and ensure the transparency of those interactions that occur. During the last years, European Commission officials have had numerous meetings with tobacco industry lobbyists wanting to influence the EU's Tobacco Products Directive  Many of these meetings were not disclosed online. This includes, as CEO's complaint shows, at least 14 undisclosed meetings involving top Commission officials from the Secretariat-General and members of Commission President Barroso's cabinet. The European Commission claims its approach is "compatible" with the WHO rules, but CEO's complaint argues that the Commission is violating its UN obligations.

The European Ombudsman has written to Commission President Barroso, asking him to respond to the allegation that the Commission has failed to properly implement Article 5.3 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and the accompanying guidelines. Barroso is also asked to respond to the suggestions put forward in CEO's complaint that the Commission should:
- undertake a thorough assessment of how to implement the WHO Convention rules across all of its departments
- publish online lists of all meetings with tobacco industry representatives and minutes of such meetings
- implement a code of conduct on relations with the tobacco industry
- ensure registration and disclosure of the identity and activities of tobacco industry lobbyists via the EU's Transparency Register

Commission President Barroso has until September 30th to respond.

Photo: European Parliament via Flickr (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

The EU is a signatory to the World Health Organisation's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, which obliges governments to limit interactions with the tobacco industry and ensure the transparency of those interactions that occur. During the last years, European Commission officials have had numerous meetings with tobacco industry lobbyists wanting to influence the EU's Tobacco Products Directive  Many of these meetings were not disclosed online. This includes, as CEO's complaint shows, at least 14 undisclosed meetings involving top Commission officials from the Secretariat-General and members of Commission President Barroso's cabinet. The European Commission claims its approach is "compatible" with the WHO rules, but CEO's complaint argues that the Commission is violating its UN obligations.The European Ombudsman has written to Commission President Barroso, asking him to respond to the allegation that the Commission has failed to properly implement Article 5.3 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and the accompanying guidelines. Barroso is also asked to respond to the suggestions put forward in CEO's complaint that the Commission should:- undertake a thorough assessment of how to implement the WHO Convention rules across all of its departments- publish online lists of all meetings with tobacco industry representatives and minutes of such meetings- implement a code of conduct on relations with the tobacco industry- ensure registration and disclosure of the identity and activities of tobacco industry lobbyists via the EU's Transparency RegisterCommission President Barroso has until September 30th to respond.Photo: European Parliament via Flickr (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)
 

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

The European Commission proposal on scientific criteria defining endocrine disruptors (EDCs) is the latest dangerous outgrowth of a highly toxic debate. The chemical lobby, supported by certain Commission factions (notably DG SANTE and the Secretary-General) and some member states (UK and Germany), has put significant obstacles in the way of effective public health and environment regulation.

In the run up to the UK referendum on EU membership on 23 June, Corporate Europe Observatory has tabled a series of freedom of information requests to find out how UK finance lobbies have been influencing the referendum negotiations and the Capital Markets Union. But the Brexit-Bremain referendum seems to be a freedom of information black hole.

From the day a referendum on UK membership of the EU was first announced in 2013, the financial sector started using Cameron’s re-negotiation process to promote its deregulatory agenda. Sometimes lobbying was required, but more often the UK government did its work for them. 

A new report on carbon market reform has kicked off debate on the issue in the European Parliament. It promises new loopholes for the oil industry and other polluters.

The official EU assessment of glyphosate was based on unpublished studies owned by industry. Seven months later, the pesticide industry still fights disclosure and, so far, successfully. We obtained a copy of their arguments.

While CEO is not taking a position on the UK referendum, many of our publications are relevant to those who will have a vote, or those who are following the debate.

Biodiversity collapse, the future of agriculture, politics versus science, EU States and the European Commission shifting blame on each other, industry's capture of the regulatory process through data secrecy, a Commissioner caught between Juncker, EU States, lobby groups, and his own services... The glyphosate saga, coming to the end of its first phase tomorrow, has been an entry point into many broader problems. Overview.

The current struggle in France over labour law reforms is not just between the Government and trade unions – a European battle is waged. The attacks on social rights stem in no small part from the web of EU-rules dubbed 'economic governance', invented to impose austerity policies on member states.

 
 
 
 
 
-- placeholder --
 
 
 

The corporate lobby tour