Corporate Europe Observatory

Exposing the power of corporate lobbying in the EU

MEPs vested interests uncovered in EU's raw materials strategy

  • Dansk
  • Nederlands
  • English
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Italiano
  • Bokmål
  • Polski
  • Portuguese
  • Română
  • Slovenščina
  • Español
  • Svenska

Brussels, 27 June 2011 – Europe's future strategy on access to raw materials – due to be voted on in the Parliament on Thursday 30 June – is being shaped by MEPs with vested interests in related industry sectors, a new report from Corporate Europe Observatory, published today, reveals [1].

Europe's resource grab highlights how key MEPs working on the EU raw materials initiative have pushed for big business to obtain unbridled access to exploit other countries' natural resources, while trying to block measures to protect the environment and workers' rights. A number of the MEPs have close links to related industry, including paid jobs and board positions.

Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) says the report reveals how vested interests are undermining the Parliament's ability to act in the public interest and is calling on the Buzek working group - which is currently developing a new code of conduct for MEPs – to act to tackle conflicts of interest, including through MEP-industry groups [2]. CEO says MEPs should be banned from holding additional paid jobs which create a conflict of interest. One in seven MEPs are thought to have a second job, often involving lobbying or influencing work [3]. The Buzek working group is expected to finalise the draft code of conduct this week.

CEO researcher and report author Pia Eberhardt said:

"Our research found that some MEPs are blatantly pushing their own vested interests and the interests of big business in promoting an EU resource grab around the world. They have argued that business must be able to access other countries’ natural resources, regardless of the rights of sovereign peoples, or measures to protect the environment and advance economic development."

The EU's raw materials initiative, published in February, has been discussed in six parliamentary committees and will be voted on in the lead committee on industry, energy and research (ITRE) on 30 June.

The report highlights how the Austrian MEP Paul Rübig, who has financial interests in companies which depend on access to raw materials and close links to lobby groups representing related industry sectors, is taking a key role on the issue, having set up an MEP working group on raw materials, which will work closely with a parallel industry group. Rübig, who is known to some as Brussels' Mr Raw Materials, has called for unhampered access to raw materials within Europe, including in protected areas, as well as the use of trade measures to secure access to resources overseas.

German MEP Elmar Brok, who led the raw materials work on the foreign affairs committee (AFET), urged the use of military means to secure access to raw materials. Brok is a senior figure in the Bertelsmann group, which owns companies with interests in the defence sector.

A number of Nordic MEPs, some with interests in the shipping industry, are also highlighted for pushing for access to natural resources in the Arctic.

Pia Eberhardt continued:

"The raw materials initiative as it stands represents a neo-colonial push to grab natural resources from around the world, risking military conflict through resource wars. EU member states are signatories to UN conventions which recognise the rights of people to determine how their natural resources should be used. The EU must also recognise those sovereign rights – and develop a strategy based on sustainable resource use, reduced demand and greater re-use and recycling of raw materials."

The need for a different approach has indeed been endorsed by some MEPs involved in the initiative, who have called for a strategy to help resource-rich countries diversify their economies and reduce dependency on raw materials to protect exhaustible natural resources. The Irish MEP Paul Murphy told CEO that the current proposals were solely in the interests of big business and as such were likely to have a damaging effect on people [4].

 

Contact

Pia Eberhardt, pia[at]corporateeurope.org

 

Notes

[1] Europe's resource grab - vested interests at work in the European Parliament, Corporate Europe Observatory, June 2011.

[2] The ad hoc working group led by Parliamentary President Jerzy Buzek was set up to develop a code of conduct for MEPs and improve transparency around relations between MEPs and lobbyists, after three MEPs were caught in a newspaper sting operation accepting well-paid second jobs in return for tabling amendments. The group is expected to finalise a draft code of conduct this week. Corporate Europe Observatory is calling on the group to include:

  • A ban on all second paid jobs for MEPs where lobbying is involved or which require them to represent others. Such paid jobs include lawyers, accountants, company board members and consultants.

  • The introduction of a detailed financial declaration by MEPs which requires them to list all outside earnings and other private interests.

  • Mandatory requirements that all cross-party groups register with the parliamentary authorities and declare their membership and income.

[3] Corporate Europe Observatory (2011): MEPs and second jobs - time to regulate.

[4] MEP: Raw Materials Initiative only in the interes of big business.

Related issues: 
 
Somebody forwarded Corporate Europe Observatory this invite to a select cocktail party on 17 July 2014, organised by the Transatlantic Business Council at the Representation of the Free State of Bavaria to the EU. Another occasion for big business representatives to meet US & EU TTIP negotiators in a pleasant and discreet environment...
No sector has lobbied the European Commission more when it was preparing negotiations on the proposed EU-US trade deal (TTIP) than the agribusiness sector, according to data published today by CEO in a series of research-based infographics.
Do you wonder which businesses are pushing most for the proposed EU-US trade deal TTIP? Or where they come from? And who has most access to EU negotiators? CEO’s at-a-glance info-graphics shine a light on the corporate lobby behind the TTIP talks.
Food is on the table at the negotiations for the EU-US trade deal the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). From a look at their lobbying demands, the agribusiness industry seems to regard the treaty as a perfect weapon to counter existing and future food regulations.
Campaign groups today called on members of the European Parliament to back citizens' demands for improved rules to prohibit the cultivation of genetically modified (GM) crops. A letter signed by five environment, consumers and farmers groups was sent to all members of the parliament's environment committee, which will debate this controversial issue later in the week.
The new European Parliament is only weeks old and already three ex-MEPs from perhaps its most important committee have taken a spin in the revolving door to join the private sector. It's clear that the code of conduct for MEPs needs urgent reform.
CEO submission to the European Ombudsman Consultation on the composition of Commission expert groups
Scientific advice should be transparent, objective and independent, and there should be more science and more diverse expertise available to the European Commission’s President, a coalition of 28 international and national NGOs wrote in a letter addressed to President-elect Jean-Claude Juncker today (1).

Corporate Europe Forum