Corporate Europe Observatory

Exposing the power of corporate lobbying in the EU

  • Dansk
  • NL
  • EN
  • FI
  • FR
  • DE
  • EL
  • IT
  • NO
  • PL
  • PT
  • RO
  • SL
  • ES
  • SV

COP21 sponsors are not so climate friendly!

From the aeronautics and car industry, to fossil and nuclear energy companies - the list of sponsors for the 21st UN Climate Conference (COP21) released today includes some of the least climate-friendly multinationals. Corporate Europe Observatory joins Friends of the Earth, ATTAC France, WECF and 350.org in denouncing the organisers and highlighting concerns that the talks are being captured by big polluters.

As France prepares to host the COP21 supposedly charged with solving the climate crisis, the French government has given a worrying indication on the sincerity of his commitment today in unveiling its choice of sponsors. Among the twenty companies on the initial sponsors list are Air France - an airline opposed to emissions reductions in the aviation sector, car manufacturers Renault-Nissan, and Suez Environement - known for its pro-fracking lobbying. "Most of these companies are big emitters of the very greenhouse gases responsible for climate change, such as EDF or Engie whose coal plants alone are equivalent to nearly half of France's entire emissions. While the French government had said that they would look for businesses with flawless reputations, many of them are involved in projects harmful to people, their quality of life and work. Putting the most important climate conference of the decade under the patronage of climate-incompatible businesses does not bode well," said Malika Peyraut of Friends of the Earth.

COP21 sponsors will provide financial and practical contributions for the organisation of the talks despite the fact that the vast majority of their activities are extremely polluting and many of their proposals constitute false solutions to the disastrous environmental and social fallout from climate change. This is the case for BNP-Paribas, which, besides being the foremost French bank in terms of support for coal between 2005 and 2014, stubbornly refuses to leave tax havens and end its tax evasion practices. "The government is offering a cheap and easy opportunity for multinational climate criminals to green-wash their image. The public interest demands that these talks not be polluted by the private interests represented by these companies," said Maxime Combes of ATTAC France. "Would we entrust the fight against tobacco to cigarette manufacturers? Why do it for climate policy?"

The French government is aiming for 20% of the overall budget of COP21 to be privately financed. "20% of private funding is more than at the COP19 in Warsaw in 2013. Back then, NGOs, social movements and trade unions left the negotiations to protest the takeover of the talks by industry and polluting lobbies. We cannot negotiate a climate agreement with those who are responsible for climate change: states must listen to citizens' interests, and not the private interests of lobbies and multinationals," said Pascoe Sabido, Corporate Europe Observatory. In proposing this list of sponsors, the government is rejecting the signal which should be sent at COP21: solving the climate crisis means ending the era of fossil fuels, rejecting false solutions such as nuclear, and rethinking our consumption and production patterns.

Contact:

Pascoe Sabido +32 (0) 4 86 85 74 1 pascoe@corporateeurope.org

Malika Peyraut malika.peyraut@amisdelaterre.org +33 (0) 6 88 48 93 68

Maxime Combes maxime.combes@gmail.com +33 (0) 6 24 51 29 44

Related issues: 
 

It's almost six months since EU Climate Commissioner Miguel Arias Cañete claimed to have negotiated an historic global deal to tackle climate change at COP21in Paris. The 3 May also marked a year and a half of Cañete being in the job. However, he and his his boss, Vice President of the Commission Maros Šefčovič, continue to give privileged access to fossil fuel players trashing the climate, who have enjoyed eight meetings to every one involving renewable energy or energy efficiency interests since the Paris deal was signed. Rather than a change of direction, it's business as usual for the European Commission following the Paris Agreement, which is great news for Big Energy but a disaster for those serious about tackling climate change.

In the middle of May over 4000 people from all over Europe gathered in the Lusatia region in Eastern Germany. The plan? To block a Vattenfall-owned opencast lignite mine.

In light of the ITRE Opinion and forthcoming discussion on the proposed Directive to reform the Emissions Trading System (and “enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments”), CEO offers comments. 

Ultimately, revisions of this sort are nowhere near enough. The new ETS Directive requires some "damage limitation." But it is also a time to reflect on the need to move beyond emissions trading at the heart of EU climate policy. There are many ways to achieve this: http://corporateeurope.org/climate-and-energy/2014/01/life-beyond-emissi...

A revised Emissions Trading Directive is like red meat for the hungry pack of lobbyists that work the corridors of Brussels’ political institutions. Even minor differences in how pollution permits are handed out can result in profits or savings of millions of euros to big polluters.

A few weeks after the May coup against Dilma Rousseff by conservative parties backed by the country's largest corporations, Brazil's “interim” government, led by Michel Temer, signed an emergency loan to the State of Rio de Janeiro to help finance infrastructure for the 2016 Olympics. The bailout was conditional to selling off the State's public water supply and sanitation company, the Companhia Estadual de Águas e Esgotos (Cedae). 

When we interviewed City Councillor and chair of Rio’s Special Committee on the Water Crisis Renato Cinco, in December 2015, he was already warning against such privatisation threats and provided important background information on the water situation in Rio.

José Manuel Barroso's move to Goldman Sachs has catapulted the EU’s revolving door problem onto the political agenda. It is symbolic of the excessive corporate influence at the highest levels of the EU.

Corporate Europe Observatory, Friends of the Earth and LobbyControl today wrote to Martin Schulz, President of the European Parliament, calling on him to investigate Angelika Nieber MEP over a possible conflict of interest.

CEO presents some first reflections on the UK's vote for Brexit.

 
 
 
 
 
-- placeholder --
 
 
 

The corporate lobby tour