Corporate Europe Observatory

Exposing the power of corporate lobbying in the EU

Poluters in Peru
  • Dansk
  • NL
  • EN
  • FI
  • FR
  • DE
  • EL
  • IT
  • NO
  • PL
  • PT
  • RO
  • SL
  • ES
  • SV

The new conquistadors making their presence felt at COP20 in Peru

A new report released at COP20 by CEO, the Democracy Center and Transnational Institute shows how corporations causing social and environmental destruction in the Andes and Amazon are driving climate change, whilst enjoying influential seats at the climate-negotiating table.

The report shows how three corporations involved in extractives industries in the Andes and Amazon are causing environmental and social damage on the ground where they operate, whilst simultaneously exerting influence to undermine climate policy-making spaces despite the fact their activities drive climate change. The report outlines how the influence that Repsol (Spanish), Glencore-Xstrata (Swiss) and Enel-Endesa (Italian/Spanish) have managed to accrue over national and international climate policy decisions enables them to push for false “solutions” which in fact allow them to continue to pollute – and even profit from doing so, through mechanisms such as carbon offsetting.

As negotiators meet to discuss a global climate agreement in Lima 'Corporate Conquistadors' casts a timely spotlight on three emblematic case studies of extractive projects in the Andean region, and outlines how the corporations running them use sophisticated manipulation tactics at every level to continue pursuing profits from environmentally-damaging activities:

  • Spanish fossil fuels giant Repsol's extraction of new gas and oil reserves in Peru poses an existential threat to the region’s indigenous territories and forests. The corporation, which attempts to present a “green” and responsible image to the world, is ramping up fossil fuel extraction at an alarming rate, pushing deeper into protected territories as it does so. At the same time, Repsol's complex web of national and international industry lobby groups has allowed it to cash in on carbon markets while blocking efforts to cut emissions at source.
  • Glencore-Xstrata's copper mining operations in Cusco, Peru are contaminating water sources in an area already experiencing water stress because of climate crisis. The Swiss-based conglomerate used political manipulation to criminalise protest and expand its operations in the region, carrying them out with impunity. Meanwhile its network of lobby groups has successfully promoted corporate-friendly policies which avoid any challenge to its dirty business model.
  • In Colombia the Italy-based consortium Enel-Endesa is attempting to frame the Quimbo hydroelectric dam as a ‘clean energy’ project, valued at tens of millions of dollars worth of UNFCCC carbon credits. But the dam's electricity is destined for dirty industry at discount prices, and the deforestation involved in creating it raises serious doubts over its 'climate-friendliness'. The dam will decimate whole communities, rivers and protected forests. Enel's lobbying efforts have ensured that climate policies benefit the main drivers of climate change and environmental destruction.

'Corporate Conquistadors' is another useful addition to the research and evidence showing the extent of questionable corporate influence over the political climate negotiations process, as well as the severe damage that mega-corporations cause in the often remote areas where they operate. This is a story that is too often neglected in reporting and public discussion of climate crisis. Given the vulnerability of developing regions like Latin America in the face of such financial and political influence, COP20 in Lima presents an excellent opportunity to bring these issues to the fore.

Available in English and Spanish

Primary issue: 
The report shows how three corporations involved in extractives industries in the Andes and Amazon are causing environmental and social damage on the ground where they operate, whilst simultaneously exerting influence to undermine climate policy-making spaces despite the fact their activities drive climate change. The report outlines how the influence that Repsol (Spanish), Glencore-Xstrata (Swiss) and Enel-Endesa (Italian/Spanish) have managed to accrue over national and international climate policy decisions enables them to push for false “solutions” which in fact allow them to continue to pollute – and even profit from doing so, through mechanisms such as carbon offsetting.As negotiators meet to discuss a global climate agreement in Lima 'Corporate Conquistadors' casts a timely spotlight on three emblematic case studies of extractive projects in the Andean region, and outlines how the corporations running them use sophisticated manipulation tactics at every level to continue pursuing profits from environmentally-damaging activities:Spanish fossil fuels giant Repsol's extraction of new gas and oil reserves in Peru poses an existential threat to the region’s indigenous territories and forests. The corporation, which attempts to present a “green” and responsible image to the world, is ramping up fossil fuel extraction at an alarming rate, pushing deeper into protected territories as it does so. At the same time, Repsol's complex web of national and international industry lobby groups has allowed it to cash in on carbon markets while blocking efforts to cut emissions at source.Glencore-Xstrata's copper mining operations in Cusco, Peru are contaminating water sources in an area already experiencing water stress because of climate crisis. The Swiss-based conglomerate used political manipulation to criminalise protest and expand its operations in the region, carrying them out with impunity. Meanwhile its network of lobby groups has successfully promoted corporate-friendly policies which avoid any challenge to its dirty business model.In Colombia the Italy-based consortium Enel-Endesa is attempting to frame the Quimbo hydroelectric dam as a ‘clean energy’ project, valued at tens of millions of dollars worth of UNFCCC carbon credits. But the dam's electricity is destined for dirty industry at discount prices, and the deforestation involved in creating it raises serious doubts over its 'climate-friendliness'. The dam will decimate whole communities, rivers and protected forests. Enel's lobbying efforts have ensured that climate policies benefit the main drivers of climate change and environmental destruction.'Corporate Conquistadors' is another useful addition to the research and evidence showing the extent of questionable corporate influence over the political climate negotiations process, as well as the severe damage that mega-corporations cause in the often remote areas where they operate. This is a story that is too often neglected in reporting and public discussion of climate crisis. Given the vulnerability of developing regions like Latin America in the face of such financial and political influence, COP20 in Lima presents an excellent opportunity to bring these issues to the fore.Available in English and Spanish
 

Comments

Submitted by Amanda Romero (not verified) on

Dear friends,

According to our methodology, we are requesting the three companies mentioned in the report of the reference to respond to the allegations included for you in it. However, we found a problem opening the Spanish version of the report. We would be grateful if you can send us that version or correct the link to be able to open it so that the companies can have access to the report in this language too.

Best regards,

Amanda Romero
South America Representative & Researcher
Business & Human Rights Resource Centre
Bogotá, Colombia (South America)

It's almost six months since EU Climate Commissioner Miguel Arias Cañete claimed to have negotiated an historic global deal to tackle climate change at COP21in Paris. The 3 May also marked a year and a half of Cañete being in the job. However, he and his his boss, Vice President of the Commission Maros Šefčovič, continue to give privileged access to fossil fuel players trashing the climate, who have enjoyed eight meetings to every one involving renewable energy or energy efficiency interests since the Paris deal was signed. Rather than a change of direction, it's business as usual for the European Commission following the Paris Agreement, which is great news for Big Energy but a disaster for those serious about tackling climate change.

In the middle of May over 4000 people from all over Europe gathered in the Lusatia region in Eastern Germany. The plan? To block a Vattenfall-owned opencast lignite mine.

In light of the ITRE Opinion and forthcoming discussion on the proposed Directive to reform the Emissions Trading System (and “enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments”), CEO offers comments. 

Ultimately, revisions of this sort are nowhere near enough. The new ETS Directive requires some "damage limitation." But it is also a time to reflect on the need to move beyond emissions trading at the heart of EU climate policy. There are many ways to achieve this: http://corporateeurope.org/climate-and-energy/2014/01/life-beyond-emissi...

A revised Emissions Trading Directive is like red meat for the hungry pack of lobbyists that work the corridors of Brussels’ political institutions. Even minor differences in how pollution permits are handed out can result in profits or savings of millions of euros to big polluters.

Ahead of the Commission's proposal for a new ‘mandatory’ lobby transparency register, CEO takes a look at the summary of the public consultation on the subject: civil society's call for better transparency systems faces the spin of corporate lobby groups and trade associations, which appear to promote transparency values but recommend limited implementation, loopholes and toothless management.

CEO's reaction to the the Bahamas leaks, which revealed ex-EU competition commissioner Neelie Kroes' offshore links.

The European Commission's upcoming regulation proposal for acrylamide, a dangerous contaminant formed in many starchy foods when cooked at high temperatures, relies on codes of best practices developed by food industry lobby groups.

A new report on the Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement (CETA) reveals how the trade deal could make EU member states vulnerable to costly lawsuits from North American investors that threaten public interest.

 
 
 
 
 
-- placeholder --
 
 
 

The corporate lobby tour