• Dansk
  • NL
  • EN
  • FI
  • FR
  • DE
  • EL
  • IT
  • NO
  • PL
  • PT
  • RO
  • SL
  • ES
  • SV

Food lobby bashes MEPs on labelling

Once again, the issue of food labelling is on the table in the European Parliament, and is at the core of heated debate. EU Food Policy (issue 56 of 15 April 2011), reports that MEPs are furious about the food industry's lobbying attempts. Breaking all etiquette rules, leaflets were placed on MEPs desks urging them to vote agains certain amendments to the Food Information proposal. MEPs across the political spectrum have denounced the aggressive industry lobbying. The Environment Committee of the European Parliament is due to vote on the issue on Tuesday 19 April.

The leaflets were distributed by the “Alliance for Food Transparency”, a name that should immediately ring alarm bells. Indeed it is funded by corporations including DSM Nutritional Products, CHR Hansen, Phytone, and Sensient.

MEP Roth-Behrendt said that she regarded this act by “Alliance for Food Transparency” as “dark and dirty”. “They have not done themselves any favours, or their clients,” she said.

The Alliance, and the lobbying blunder, has been set up by CLAN Public Affairs. Yves Lespinay of CLAN Public Affairs told EU Food Policy that the Alliance for Food Transparency was a “highly ethical” organisation. Lespinay is not new to the Brussels bubble though, being one of the ‘high-level experts’ teaching a Masterclass in EU lobbying at the European Training Institute (ETI). Both ETI and CLAN Public Affairs are based at 57 Rue Froissart in the EU quarter.

The Parliament's lead person on the issue, Sommer wants energy information on food products to be shown on the front of a pack per portion of 100 ml or 100 g. But the food industry is still lobbying hard for its Guideline Daily Amount model. Sommer said the level of lobbying on portions was "very aggressive and unacceptable".

Also MEP Holger Krahmer, who in the past has not been unwilling to host closed industry events in the Parliament, accused the lobbyists of making "false claims" in the information provided, and disqualified the lobbying as "not very responsible, a discredited approach".

Last year, CEO reported how the food lobby, led by lobby group CIAA,spent over a billion euros to fend off mandatory health information of food packaging in the form of traffic light labelling. The traffic light labelling was defeated by the lobbying battle.

At that point, CIAA even denied that they were a lobby organisation.

Finally in December last year, they joined the Commission’s voluntary lobbying register, effectively admitting they are lobbyists but grossly under-rating their lobbying expenditure (declared lobby budget 200,000-250,000 in 2009).

CEO has filed a complaint against CIAA’s submission in the lobbying register with the European Commission.

The complaint says: “According to its annual report, the CIAA in 2009 employed more than 21 full-time staff and they spent over 1,800,000 euro in wages. [..] it is impossible that only less than 14% of the staff cost of an EU-level lobby group is related to its lobbying. [..] The CIAA currently has 10 accredited lobbyists at the European Parliament, another signal that the real figure for its lobbying expenditure is far higher than what is reported.”



Exposing the lobbying of big business costs money. Would you consider a donation to help us continue? We refuse funding from the EU, governments, political parties and corporations to be as independent as possible, so every single donation really helps. Thanks!




Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Get our monthly newsletter

Follow us on social media

Documents released to Corporate Europe Observatory following a Freedom of Information request reveal how pro-biotech lobby platform Public Research Regulation Initiative (PRRI) unites industry, researchers and regulators in ‘like-minded’ groups to influence crucial international biosafety talks under the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD).

In May 2017, the global biotech and seed industry lobby groups landed in Budapest for their annual congress. They launched a joint campaign with one key goal: to get governments worldwide to adopt a zero-regulation approach to new genetic modification (GM) techniques, often termed gene-editing techniques. The seed industry magazine SeedWorld stated that the timing of this international campaign is critical “as policymakers and governments around the world discuss plant breeding innovations, and if and how they should be regulated”.

On the occasion of the International Day of Farmers' Struggle, we have jointly with allies prepared five short visions for a sustainable, healthy and fair food and trade policy to restart this important debate.

Wouldn't it be time that the EU stops allowing a direct representation of the food industry's interests on the Board of the EU Food Safety Authority (EFSA)?