Corporate Europe Observatory

Exposing the power of corporate lobbying in the EU

  • Dansk
  • NL
  • EN
  • FI
  • FR
  • DE
  • EL
  • IT
  • NO
  • PL
  • PT
  • RO
  • SL
  • ES
  • SV

A Toxic Affair: How the chemical lobby blocked action on hormone disrupting chemicals

An investigation led by research and campaign group Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) and journalist Stéphane Horel exposes corporate lobby groups mobilising to stop the EU taking action on hormone (endocrine) disrupting chemicals (EDCs). The report sheds light on how corporations and their lobby groups have used numerous tactics from the corporate lobbying playbook: scaremongering, evidence-discrediting, and delaying tactics, as well as using the ongoing TTIP negotiations as a leverage. But industry's interests were also defended by actors within the Commission.

(Traducción en castellano hecho por Ecologistas en Acción: descargar PDF aqui)
 

Endocrine disruptors are chemicals that are present in everyday products – from plastics and cosmetics to pesticides. Because of their ability to interact with the hormonal (endocrine) systems of living organisms, they are suspected of having severe health and environmental impacts.

EU law demands action be taken on endocrine disruptors, with clear deadlines set. According to these rules, if a chemical is identified as an endocrine disruptor, a ban follows. The current approach is that chemicals are assessed following risk assessment procedures and safe levels of exposure are set accordingly. However, for endocrine disruptors it might be impossible to set such 'safe' levels.

The Directorate-General (DG) for the Environment of the European Commission was put in charge of establishing a set of scientific criteria for 'what is an endocrine disruptor'. The chemical industry lobby was up in arms at the potential banning of some EDCs. The main lobby groups involved were the chemical and pesticide lobbies (CEFIC - European Chemical Industry Council & ECPA - European Crop Protection Association), and the corporations at the forefront were BASF and Bayer. But they found allies in various member states, actors within the European Commission, and in the European Parliament.

Read the press release here.

Download the report here.

 

Comments

Submitted by Mrs. Susan Cary... (not verified) on

Organic is the way to go. It is proven that mono crops, prairie style farming without trees to bring minerals from the deep soil, chemical fertilizer etc. is bad for all species. Humans are now deficient in many minerals even though they are well fed, they are nutrient poor.
Lobbyists should not have the ear of those who form policy that effects populations.
Farms who use chemicals should have to state what is used in the same way that organic farms have to prove their status.
Crops and animals which enter the food chain having been grown, fed or grazed on land sprayed with Glyphosate or other chemicals should be clearly labelled. GMO food should be clearly labelled as should non-GMO, that way the consumer has information and choice.

Submitted by Ahmad Mahdavi (not verified) on

Western countries as the site of production of toxic compounds have already developed ways to manage and cope with consequences somehow via regulations wide NGOs and community workers activities but the situation in most developing countries and in particular Middle Eastern countries is different and people and environment are highly exposed to these ever increasing millions of chemicals and their metabolites and possibilities of synergism. Now that EU REACH laws and regulations are leading the World for toxic pollution regulation and prevention they better to think also to give immediate hand to nearby Middle Eastern countries with no regulatory systems and absolutely no enforcement system.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

LEt’s kick Big Oil and Gas out of EU and UN climate policy. sign the petition now!

Ahead of the opening of the International Monsanto Tribunal in The Hague, Corporate Europe Observatory presents an overview of Monsanto’s lobbying strategies at national, EU, and international levels.

Corporations like Monsanto have limitless resources to buy political power through lobbying. This short guide, published at the occasion of the International Monsanto Tribunal in The Hague, exposes some of Monsanto’s key lobbying strategies and tools, illustrated with examples from different parts of the world.

How the agribusiness lobby has weakened the new EU air quality directive with serious consequences for health. An article written by Vincent Harmsen en Berna van Vilsteren and translated by Iris Maher.
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) told CEO today, and publicly announced on their website, that they would disclose most of the raw data of studies on glyphosate used in the EU's toxicity assessment of glyphosate.

In the last years, controversies around the financialisation of nature and the concept of natural capital have fuelled divisions within civil society.

Over 450 public interest groups from across Europe and Canada today published an open letter urging legislators to vote against the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA). They joined forces to defend people and planet against the threats posed by the EU-Canada agreement.

8 November 2016 saw the annual lobby fest between the Commission and BusinessEurope. Lasting for over seven hours, attracting four commissioners and the secretary-general, as well as 26 major corporate interests (who between them spend over €31,789,000 a year on EU lobbying), this is exclusive, privileged access at its most extreme.

New analysis of lobby meetings shows that EU Climate Commissioner Miguel Arias Cañete and his colleague Maroš Šefčovič, Vice President for the Energy Union, have overwhelmingly met corporate lobbyists, rather than public interest groups.

 
 
 
 
 
-- placeholder --
 
 
 

The corporate lobby tour