Corporate Europe Observatory

Exposing the power of corporate lobbying in the EU

  • Dansk
  • NL
  • EN
  • FI
  • FR
  • DE
  • EL
  • IT
  • NO
  • PL
  • PT
  • RO
  • SL
  • ES
  • SV

MEPs on industry payroll: potential conflicts of interest persist in EU parliament – new research

Nine cases of MEPs who have other jobs while holding public office

Report available here: http://corporateeurope.org/sites/default/files/foee_ceo_lc_-_1506_-_whos...

Potential conflicts of interest continue to plague the European Parliament one year after elections, finds new research released today.

The report from Friends of the Earth Europe, Corporate Europe Observatory and LobbyControl, details nine cases of MEPs who have other jobs while holding public office and are at risk of potential conflicts of interest.

All nine MEPs hold paid positions in companies or business associations that directly or indirectly lobby EU decision-makers on current legislative files. The cases include parliamentarians from Poland, Italy, Germany, Belgium, France, the UK, Denmark and Austria [2] – some of which had already given rise to concerns in the last parliamentary term.

Paul de Clerck of Friends of the Earth Europe said: “It is not acceptable that MEPs work for companies that are at the same time lobbying the EU. This undermines public trust in law-making and the integrity of the European Parliament. MEPs should be their electorate’s representative, not industry’s representative.”

The report authors point out that the existing code of conduct for MEPs, introduced in 2012, is insufficiently enforced and riddled with loopholes so that problematic cases keep arising.

Olivier Hoedeman from Corporate Europe Observatory said: “Voters deserve better than a weak code of conduct that has done very little to end the problem of undue influence and potential conflicts of interest. Parliament's President Martin Schulz should act on this now and show citizens that he's serious about tackling this threat to democracy.”

Nina Katzemich from LobbyControl said: “Three years after the code of conduct was adopted, there are still many MEPs with potential conflicts of interest and dubious declarations of financial interest. It is high time for an overhaul. We demand the parliament bans all side jobs in companies or associations that try to influence EU legislation.”

Friends of the Earth Europe, Corporate Europe Observatory and LobbyControl are recommending the parliament’s code of conduct be strengthened in the following ways:

  • Develop a clear definition of the circumstances under which side activities by MEPs constitute a conflict of interest. This must include a ban on MEPs holding positions in companies, trade associations and other groups that are trying to influence EU legislation.

  • Prohibit MEPs from accepting external support, be it staff or financial support (with the exception of political parties).

  • Implement tighter disclosure requirements for outside financial interests, force MEPs to be more specific about their outside earnings, and ensure full disclosure of any monthly income above €10,000 as well as giving more detailed descriptions of ambiguous job titles.

  • Change the composition of the advisory committee on the code of conduct for MEPs to include independent ethics experts, and enable it to investigate any potential conflict of interest independently as required.

  • Strengthen sanctions for MEPs with conflicts of interest.

***

For more information please contact:

Paul de Clerck, Friends of the Earth Europe: +32 494 38 09 59, paul.declerck@foeeurope.org

Olivier Hoedeman, Corporate Europe Observatory: +32 474 48 65 45, olivier@corporateeurope.org

Nina Katzemich, LobbyControl: +49 221 995 715 15, +49 179 50 930 22, nina.katzemich@lobbycontrol.de

Notes:

[1] The report ‘Whose representatives? MEPs on the industry payroll’ can be found here: foee_ceo_lc_-_1506_-_whose_representatives_-meps_on_the_industry_payrollfinal.pdf:

[2] The MEPs featured in the report are: Michał Boni – Poland; Bendt Bendtsen – Denmark; Birgit Collin-Langen – Germany; Nirj Deva – UK; Rachida Dati – France; Dariusz Rosati – Poland; Paul Rübig – Austria; Renato Soru – Italy, Guy Verhofstadt – Belgium.

Update on June 18, 2015: After the publication of this report MEP Michał Boni contacted the author to clarify that he no longer has a paid role with the Polish business organisation Lewiatan. In his letter Mr Boni clarifies that his activities took place between January 2014 and June 2014. Mr Boni states: "I apologize for my incorrectly filled Declaration of the Member's Financial Interests, which I submitted on July 1st, 2014". 
Friends of the Earth Europe, Corporate Europe Observatory and LobbyControl call on Mr Boni to rectify his Declaration of Financial Interest.

Click here to read Mr Boni's full response to the report.

Report available here: http://corporateeurope.org/sites/default/files/foee_ceo_lc_-_1506_-_whos...Potential conflicts of interest continue to plague the European Parliament one year after elections, finds new research released today.The report from Friends of the Earth Europe, Corporate Europe Observatory and LobbyControl, details nine cases of MEPs who have other jobs while holding public office and are at risk of potential conflicts of interest.All nine MEPs hold paid positions in companies or business associations that directly or indirectly lobby EU decision-makers on current legislative files. The cases include parliamentarians from Poland, Italy, Germany, Belgium, France, the UK, Denmark and Austria [2] – some of which had already given rise to concerns in the last parliamentary term.Paul de Clerck of Friends of the Earth Europe said: “It is not acceptable that MEPs work for companies that are at the same time lobbying the EU. This undermines public trust in law-making and the integrity of the European Parliament. MEPs should be their electorate’s representative, not industry’s representative.”The report authors point out that the existing code of conduct for MEPs, introduced in 2012, is insufficiently enforced and riddled with loopholes so that problematic cases keep arising.Olivier Hoedeman from Corporate Europe Observatory said: “Voters deserve better than a weak code of conduct that has done very little to end the problem of undue influence and potential conflicts of interest. Parliament's President Martin Schulz should act on this now and show citizens that he's serious about tackling this threat to democracy.”Nina Katzemich from LobbyControl said: “Three years after the code of conduct was adopted, there are still many MEPs with potential conflicts of interest and dubious declarations of financial interest. It is high time for an overhaul. We demand the parliament bans all side jobs in companies or associations that try to influence EU legislation.”Friends of the Earth Europe, Corporate Europe Observatory and LobbyControl are recommending the parliament’s code of conduct be strengthened in the following ways:Develop a clear definition of the circumstances under which side activities by MEPs constitute a conflict of interest. This must include a ban on MEPs holding positions in companies, trade associations and other groups that are trying to influence EU legislation.Prohibit MEPs from accepting external support, be it staff or financial support (with the exception of political parties).Implement tighter disclosure requirements for outside financial interests, force MEPs to be more specific about their outside earnings, and ensure full disclosure of any monthly income above €10,000 as well as giving more detailed descriptions of ambiguous job titles.Change the composition of the advisory committee on the code of conduct for MEPs to include independent ethics experts, and enable it to investigate any potential conflict of interest independently as required.Strengthen sanctions for MEPs with conflicts of interest.***For more information please contact:Paul de Clerck, Friends of the Earth Europe: +32 494 38 09 59, paul.declerck@foeeurope.orgOlivier Hoedeman, Corporate Europe Observatory: +32 474 48 65 45, olivier@corporateeurope.orgNina Katzemich, LobbyControl: +49 221 995 715 15, +49 179 50 930 22, nina.katzemich@lobbycontrol.de Notes:[1] The report ‘Whose representatives? MEPs on the industry payroll’ can be found here: foee_ceo_lc_-_1506_-_whose_representatives_-meps_on_the_industry_payrollfinal.pdf:[2] The MEPs featured in the report are: Michał Boni – Poland; Bendt Bendtsen – Denmark; Birgit Collin-Langen – Germany; Nirj Deva – UK; Rachida Dati – France; Dariusz Rosati – Poland; Paul Rübig – Austria; Renato Soru – Italy, Guy Verhofstadt – Belgium.Update on June 18, 2015: After the publication of this report MEP Michał Boni contacted the author to clarify that he no longer has a paid role with the Polish business organisation Lewiatan. In his letter Mr Boni clarifies that his activities took place between January 2014 and June 2014. Mr Boni states: "I apologize for my incorrectly filled Declaration of the Member's Financial Interests, which I submitted on July 1st, 2014". Friends of the Earth Europe, Corporate Europe Observatory and LobbyControl call on Mr Boni to rectify his Declaration of Financial Interest.Click here to read Mr Boni's full response to the report.
 

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Ahead of the Commission's proposal for a new ‘mandatory’ lobby transparency register, CEO takes a look at the summary of the public consultation on the subject: civil society's call for better transparency systems faces the spin of corporate lobby groups and trade associations, which appear to promote transparency values but recommend limited implementation, loopholes and toothless management.

CEO's reaction to the the Bahamas leaks, which revealed ex-EU competition commissioner Neelie Kroes' offshore links.

The European Commission's upcoming regulation proposal for acrylamide, a dangerous contaminant formed in many starchy foods when cooked at high temperatures, relies on codes of best practices developed by food industry lobby groups.

The Juncker Commission last week informed the European Ombudsman that it would refer Barroso’s appointment as chairman of Goldman Sachs to its Ad hoc Ethical Committee. But what is the Ad hoc Ethical Committee, who sits on it and what is it likely to say?

Ahead of the Commission's proposal for a new ‘mandatory’ lobby transparency register, CEO takes a look at the summary of the public consultation on the subject: civil society's call for better transparency systems faces the spin of corporate lobby groups and trade associations, which appear to promote transparency values but recommend limited implementation, loopholes and toothless management.

CEO's reaction to the the Bahamas leaks, which revealed ex-EU competition commissioner Neelie Kroes' offshore links.

The European Commission's upcoming regulation proposal for acrylamide, a dangerous contaminant formed in many starchy foods when cooked at high temperatures, relies on codes of best practices developed by food industry lobby groups.

A new report on the Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement (CETA) reveals how the trade deal could make EU member states vulnerable to costly lawsuits from North American investors that threaten public interest.

 
 
 
 
 
-- placeholder --
 
 
 

The corporate lobby tour