Corporate Europe Observatory

Exposing the power of corporate lobbying in the EU

  • Dansk
  • NL
  • EN
  • FI
  • FR
  • DE
  • EL
  • IT
  • NO
  • PL
  • PT
  • RO
  • SL
  • ES
  • SV

#scienceVlobbying - public conference

Policy-makers want their decisions to be based on the best available evidence; controlling this evidence is therefore a key component of the strategy of the lobbyists who can afford it. Among the tactics used: funding self-serving research to use for their lobbying, discrediting critical science, scientists or scientific institutions, artificially prolonging scientific debate to preserve commercial positions, capturing public research policy to limit funding for independent scrutiny... 

What can citizens, public authorities in general and the EU in particular do against such tactics? How to make the existing EU scientific evidence appraisal system evolve towards better serving the public interest and provide public representatives and officials with reliable answers to their questions? How to organise the production of knowledge in society in a way that is relevant to our collective needs?  

Analysing evidence politics, discussing evidence policies: this will be our program for these two days. You are warmly invited to join us. 

WHEN? from 2pm to 9pm (Brussels time) on 22/09, and from 9am to 1pm on 23/09

WHERE? Brussels, Mundo-b (Rue d'Edimbourg 26) on the 22/09 and the European Parliament (Place Luxembourg entrance, room P7C050) on the 23/09.

HOW? As we have now reached full capacity, we're sorry we cannot accept new registrations any more. However you will be able to follow the entire event via livestream on CEO's Youtube channel on the 22nd and on this link on the 23d.

WHO? Please see the detailed programme

WHAT? The event will be entirely webstreamed, filmed for later publication, and proceedings will be published. Please have a look at the conference's bibliography.

Hashtag: #scienceVlobbying

Policy-makers want their decisions to be based on the best available evidence; controlling this evidence is therefore a key component of the strategy of the lobbyists who can afford it. Among the tactics used: funding self-serving research to use for their lobbying, discrediting critical science, scientists or scientific institutions, artificially prolonging scientific debate to preserve commercial positions, capturing public research policy to limit funding for independent scrutiny... What can citizens, public authorities in general and the EU in particular do against such tactics? How to make the existing EU scientific evidence appraisal system evolve towards better serving the public interest and provide public representatives and officials with reliable answers to their questions? How to organise the production of knowledge in society in a way that is relevant to our collective needs?  Analysing evidence politics, discussing evidence policies: this will be our program for these two days. You are warmly invited to join us. WHEN? from 2pm to 9pm (Brussels time) on 22/09, and from 9am to 1pm on 23/09WHERE? Brussels, Mundo-b (Rue d'Edimbourg 26) on the 22/09 and the European Parliament (Place Luxembourg entrance, room P7C050) on the 23/09.HOW? As we have now reached full capacity, we're sorry we cannot accept new registrations any more. However you will be able to follow the entire event via livestream on CEO's Youtube channel on the 22nd and on this link on the 23d.WHO? Please see the detailed programmeWHAT? The event will be entirely webstreamed, filmed for later publication, and proceedings will be published. Please have a look at the conference's bibliography.Hashtag: #scienceVlobbying
 

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Ahead of the Commission's proposal for a new ‘mandatory’ lobby transparency register, CEO takes a look at the summary of the public consultation on the subject: civil society's call for better transparency systems faces the spin of corporate lobby groups and trade associations, which appear to promote transparency values but recommend limited implementation, loopholes and toothless management.

CEO's reaction to the the Bahamas leaks, which revealed ex-EU competition commissioner Neelie Kroes' offshore links.

The European Commission's upcoming regulation proposal for acrylamide, a dangerous contaminant formed in many starchy foods when cooked at high temperatures, relies on codes of best practices developed by food industry lobby groups.

The Juncker Commission last week informed the European Ombudsman that it would refer Barroso’s appointment as chairman of Goldman Sachs to its Ad hoc Ethical Committee. But what is the Ad hoc Ethical Committee, who sits on it and what is it likely to say?

Ahead of the Commission's proposal for a new ‘mandatory’ lobby transparency register, CEO takes a look at the summary of the public consultation on the subject: civil society's call for better transparency systems faces the spin of corporate lobby groups and trade associations, which appear to promote transparency values but recommend limited implementation, loopholes and toothless management.

CEO's reaction to the the Bahamas leaks, which revealed ex-EU competition commissioner Neelie Kroes' offshore links.

The European Commission's upcoming regulation proposal for acrylamide, a dangerous contaminant formed in many starchy foods when cooked at high temperatures, relies on codes of best practices developed by food industry lobby groups.

A new report on the Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement (CETA) reveals how the trade deal could make EU member states vulnerable to costly lawsuits from North American investors that threaten public interest.

 
 
 
 
 
-- placeholder --
 
 
 

The corporate lobby tour