Corporate Europe Observatory

Exposing the power of corporate lobbying in the EU

  • Dansk
  • NL
  • EN
  • FI
  • FR
  • DE
  • EL
  • IT
  • NO
  • PL
  • PT
  • RO
  • SL
  • ES
  • SV

Commission backtracks on fracking advisory group following complaint

Photo: Kate Ausburn on Flickr

The European Commission has excluded all stakeholders from an industry-dominated expert group on fracking following a complaint to the European Ombudsman from Friends of the Earth Europe and Corporate Europe Observatory [1].

The “European Science and Technology Network on Unconventional Hydrocarbon Extraction” was under investigation from the European Ombudsman for bias in favour of the fracking industry, and potential conflicts of interest from all working group chairs [2].

The European Commission consistently refuted the accusations, but has now taken the decision to move the work in-house, shortly before the Ombudsman presents her findings [3]. The decision will take effect after the Annual conference on Tuesday 23 February.

Antoine Simon, shale gas campaigner for Friends of the Earth Europe said: "It’s no coincidence that the European Commission decides to scrap this expert group shortly before the European Ombudsman rules on our claim for malpractice. The fracking ‘Expert group’ was a lobby vehicle for the fracking industry, and its demise is a victory for the environment and the public interest.

Transparency is crucial now that the Commission has taken on the work of assessing the dangers of fracking. Shale gas development is deeply incompatible with tackling climate change, and is in complete contradiction to what little we got from the climate talks in Paris."

Pascoe Sabido, researcher and campaigner at Corporate Europe Observatory said: “Ending fracking industry involvement in the group is surely a victory for the majority of European citizens opposed to the practice. Giving pro-fracking interests four-fifths of the seats, as well all chair and vice-chair positions, was only going to result in pro-industry recommendations. But closing the advisory group to all stake-holders points to a bigger problem: that the Commission simply couldn't rebalance it away from industry.”

Both Friends of the Earth Europe and Corporate Europe Observatory, along with the Ombudsman and European Parliament, have repeatedly pointed to industry dominance in groups advising on everything from taxation to trade, something the European Commission continues to ignore [4].

***

For more information please contact:

Antoine Simon, shale gas campaigner for Friends of the Earth Europe

Tel: +32 (0) 486 685 664 Email: antoine.simon@foeeurope.org

Pascoe Sabido, researcher and campaigner at Corporate Europe Observatory

Tel: Tel: +32 (0) 4 86 85 74 16 Email: pascoe@corporateeurope.org

***


NOTES:

[1] Friends of the Earth Europe, Carte Blanche for Fracking, April 2015: http://www.foeeurope.org/carte-blanche-fracking

Friends of the Earth Europe and Corporate Europe Observatory complaint to the European Ombudsman: https://cloud.foeeurope.org/index.php/s/0wKmTyvrCndi8EK

[2] European Science and Technology Network on Unconventional Hydrocarbon Extraction: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/uh-network

[3] European Commission response to Friends of the Earth Europe and Corporate Europe Observatory claims: https://cloud.foeeurope.org/index.php/s/etH1VQxt6AJ1iw3

Final comments provided by Friends of the Earth Europe and Corporate Europe Observatory: https://cloud.foeeurope.org/index.php/s/45uQo83xWe9hV8s

[4] The Ombudsman opened her own investigation into the Commission's advisory groups, formally called Expert Groups, and has given the Commission until April 30th to respond to her final recommendations, after the Commission refused to address balance after it was raised in her first set of recommendations; the European Parliament has twice frozen the Commission's Expert Group budget, demanding balanced groups, while its Budget Control Committee is currently writing an own initiative report on Expert Groups, highlighting the crucial issue of balance. The Commission is supposed to release new horizontal rules on Expert Groups, but is reported to once more ignore the issue of balance. Civil society groups have written an open letter to the Commission asking for the new rules to be delayed to ensure input from Parliament (via its report) and civil society (via a public consultation).

Related issues: 
 

A new report on carbon market reform has kicked off debate on the issue in the European Parliament. It promises new loopholes for the oil industry and other polluters.

In light of the ITRE Opinion and forthcoming discussion on the proposed Directive to reform the Emissions Trading System (and “enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments”), CEO offers comments. 

Ultimately, revisions of this sort are nowhere near enough. The new ETS Directive requires some "damage limitation." But it is also a time to reflect on the need to move beyond emissions trading at the heart of EU climate policy. There are many ways to achieve this: http://corporateeurope.org/climate-and-energy/2014/01/life-beyond-emissi...

A revised Emissions Trading Directive is like red meat for the hungry pack of lobbyists that work the corridors of Brussels’ political institutions. Even minor differences in how pollution permits are handed out can result in profits or savings of millions of euros to big polluters.

A rare glimpse into the lobbying strategies of the car industry.

The Commission is set to announce its proposal for a new ‘mandatory’ lobby transparency register next week. During the Summer, the Commission made public the input it received via consultation on the topic. Besides a general call from public and civil society to boost transparency systems, they also showed corporate lobby groups and trade associations’ spin, promoting transparency values while recommending limited implementation, loopholes and toothless management.

CEO's immediate reaction to the latest revelations from the team behind the Panama Leaks.

The European Commission is about to propose a regulation on acrylamide, a dangerous contaminant formed in many starchy foods when cooked at high temperatures. But the regulation itself consists in referring to codes of best practices developed by lobby groups representing the food industry.

A new report on the Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement (CETA) reveals how the trade deal could make EU member states vulnerable to costly lawsuits from North American investors that threaten public interest.

 
 
 
 
 
-- placeholder --
 
 
 

The corporate lobby tour