Stay always informed
Interested in our articles? Get the latest information and analysis straight to your email. Sign up for our newsletter.
The European Commission has launched its highly controversial proposal to deregulate New GMOs or ‘new genomic techniques’. This will increase risks for the environment and health, and undermine the rights of farmers and consumers.
The new proposal means:
Corporate Europe Observatory, along with hundreds of environmental and farming groups, is strongly opposed to this proposal.
Nina Holland researcher at Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) says:
“This deregulation proposal is a massive give-away by the European Commission to corporations like Bayer and BASF, without getting anything in return.
“This will not lead to more sustainable farming practices, on the contrary. The assumption the Commission makes that new GMOs would lead to more sustainability were based solely on industry’s claims, instead of real evidence.
“Since new GM seeds will be patented, this will erode farmers’ rights, and it will lead to a further monopolisation of the already highly concentrated seed market.
“Unless corrected by member states and the European Parliament, such a move would ignore the interests of farmers, civil society and biodiversity.”
Direct outcome of corporate lobby push
This deregulation was driven by the biotech multinational giants Bayer (Monsanto), BASF, Syngenta and Corteva, with some researchers from institutes like the VIB or Wageningen University acting as their frontmen claiming to invoke the “authority of science” while having close ties to industry. Corporate Europe Observatory has been documenting this intense lobbying push for deregulation for years.
Nina Holland, Corporate Europe Observatory, says:
“The Commission wrongly claims that this deregulation of new GMOs will help obtain the EU Green Deal objectives. There is no evidence that new GMOs will reduce pesticides, and since the dominant biotech seed and pesticide corporations are one and the same (Bayer, BASF, Corteva, Syngenta) there is even less reason to believe that this would be their priority.
“The European Commission was warned of the negative consequences of such a proposal multiple times by scientists, small farmers, the organic food sector and a large number of civil society organisations. DG SANTE has chosen to consistently ignore the voices of these groups to the extent of breaking its own rules on democratic process
“Environmental and consumer safety authorities, as well as members of the EU Parliament, should outright reject this proposal.”
The EU Ombudsman started an inquiry last month after CEO and Friends of the Earth Europe submitted a complaint about the biased process by DG SANTE.
More information: Nina Holland, Corporate Europe Observatory researcher, mobile + 32 466 294420, email firstname.lastname@example.org
Notes to the editor: